摘要(Abstract)：
认诺是被告在诉讼程序中作出的以终结诉讼为目的对原告诉讼请求的认可。认诺在实体层面改变了原被告之间的权利义务关系,因而兼有诉讼行为和实体处分行为的双重属性。认诺行为的成立要件包括认诺行为人具有诉讼行为能力或代理人拥有代理权限、认诺不违法且不违反公序良俗、认诺对象属于当事人可处分事项、行为人认诺的意思表示真实。法院依据有效成立的被告认诺作出判决,其效力与一般判决相同。对于确有错误的认诺判决可通过上诉或再审予以救济,但救济理由仅限于程序违法或认诺行为不符合成立要件。
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 赵清;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1“The party needs not to present evidences for the following facts:(1)where one party clearly expresses recognition of case facts and litigation claim filed by the other party”provided by article 75 of Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues concerning the Application of the“Civil Procedure Law of the Peoples Republic of China”[FF(1992)22]now has stopped and become invalid.
- 2 There are only two relevant monographs,see ZHANG JIAHUI,LEGAL RESEARCH ON PARTY'S LITIGATION ACT(China Democracy and Law Press,2005);WANG DEXIN,THEORETICAL RESEARCH ON ACT OF CIVIL LITIGATION(China University of Politic Science and Law Press,2011).
- 3 Chen Aiwu,Discussion on Acknowledgement of the Party in Civil Procedure,4 Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)450-457(2001).
- 4 Chen Gang,The Great Significance of Legal System Consciousness in the Research of Civil Procedural Law,5 Chinese Journal of Law 40(2012).
- 5 Duan Wenbo,Establishing the Interlocutory Judgment System in Our Civil Litigation,10 Political Science and Law 144(2009).
- 6 Chen Aiwu,Admission in Civil Action,23(4)Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College 450(2001).
- 7 LENT,ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY PURE MEANING OF PROCEDURE,in FOR L.ROSENGERG'S BIRTHDAY MEMORIAL,at 123(Beck Press,1949).
- 8 Article 781 Debt Recognition of the German Civil Code:it needs to give an intention of recognition in writing to make contracts(debts)recognize the existence of debt relationship effective,where any other mode is provided for the establishment of debt relationship recognizing its existence,it needs to adopt this mode for recognizing contracts,see DU JINGLIN&LU CHEN,ANNOTATIONS TO GERMAN CIVIL CODE,at 441-442(Law Press,2011).
- 9 BAUMGARTEL,THE NATURE AND CONCEPTION OF LITIGATION ACTION,at 143(Carl Heymanns Verlag,1957);Japanese jurist Isikawa Akira transported this thesis and serialized on Hanrei Times No.353-355,357,359,360-364,366,368;Uemura Akihiro,Conception of Litigation Act in Civil Litigation,29 The Journal of the Association of Law and Economics 55(1959).
- 10 ISIKAWAAKIRA,RESAERCH OF LITIGATION ACTION,at 163-168(Sakai Syoten Press,1975).
- 11 Isikawa Akira,Legal Nature of Acknowledgment,13 Journal of Civil Procedure Law,102(1963).
- 12 LENT,supranote 7,138.
- 13 It is provided by article 267 of the Civil Procedure Law of Japan that“reconciliation,waiver or acknowledgement of litigation claim shall be recorded into a document,and the record shall have equal validity of judgment”.Therefore,the document recoding the defendant's acknowledgement content is called“acknowledgment document”in Japan,similar to written statement used in Chinese practice,and translated into“acknowledgement letter”in this paper.
- 14 KAKEKO HAJIME ET AL.,EXPLENATION OF CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW,at 1466(Koubundou Press,2011).
- 15 As for the discussion about connotation and function of litigation essentials,see Zhang Weiping,The Requirements to Commence an Action and Substantive Requirements of Judgment,6 Chinese Journal of Law(2004);Xue Shaofeng,Discussion on the Requirements of Civil Litigation,12 Forward Position(2006).
- 16 SINDOU KOUJI,WHOM IS THE CIVIL PROCEDURE THEORY FOR,in KONDO UKANJI&ASAMUMA TAKESI,PROBLEMS OF CIVIL LAW,at 259ff(Hanrei Times Press,1970).
- 17 Suzuki Masahiro,The Hearing Order of Litigation Essentials and Judgment Essentials,57(4)Journal of Civil and Commercial Law3(1967).
- 18 SAKAGUCHI YOUEI,LITIGATION ESSENTIAL THEORY AND REASONS OF COUNTERARGUMENT,PROBLEMS OF JUDGE LAW(Ⅱ),at 244(Yuhikaku Press,1969).
- 19 KANEKO HAJIME,NEW SYSYTEM OF CIVIL PROCEDURE(Revised Edition),at 213(Sakei Syoten Press,1965);SAISOU HIDEO,INTRODUCTION OF CIVIL PROCEDURE(New Edition),at 237(Yuhikaku Press,1982);BAUMGARTEL,supra note9,115.
- 20 Like the theory of“act of taking effect”and“act with effect”raised by Goldschmidt,see GOLDSCHMIDT,DYNAMIC LEGAL PROCESS,at 465(J.Springer,1925);about the Constitution of Conception Theory raised by Walsmann,see WALSMANN,THE MISTAKE IN LEGAL PROCESS,at 1(Nabu Press 1907);as to Werner's Meaning Respect Theory,see Werner,Lacking the Willing of Litigation,41 Private Journal of Public Law by Grunhuts 378(1915).
- 21 CARL HAHN,MATERIAL ABOUT LEGISLATION OF 1881 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE,at 285(Neud,1983).
- 22 KATOU MASAHIRO,THE REMEDIAL STRUCTURE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,at 63(Yuhikaku Press,1937).
- 23 MIKAZUKI AKIRA,CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW,at 509-510(Koubundou Press,1992).
