摘要(Abstract)：
公益诉讼主体在我国属于长期缺位的状态,被损害的公共利益无法得到及时有效的救济。在此背景之下,全国人大常委会于2015年7月授权最高人民检察院在13个试点省开展检察机关提起公益诉讼的试点。经过近两年的试点,我国公益诉讼呈现出诉前程序功能巨大、公益诉讼领域集中、整体稳步推进的特点。从统计数据上看,检察机关提起公益诉讼呈现出积极发展的趋势,但在如何认定行政不作为、初步证据的界定、证据时效、行政公益诉讼庭审程序、第三人能否参与诉讼、检察院以何种方式启动二审以及检察机关诉讼地位等相关问题上仍缺乏适当的规定。就我国的公益诉讼立法而言,需要对公益诉讼热进行冷思考。
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 张倩;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1 Data is from the briefing on pilot project of public interest litigations instituted by procuratorial organs in June 2017.
- 2 The thirteen pilot regions are Beijing,Jilin,Inner Mongolia,Shandong,Jiangsu,Anhui,Hubei,Fujian,Guangdong,Guizhou,Yunnan,Shaanxi,and Gansu.
- 3 THE MID-TERM REPORT ON PILOT WORK OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONS INSTITUTED BY PROCURATORIAL ORGANS FROM THE SUPREME PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE,MADE BY THE PROCURATOR GENERAL OF THE SUPREME PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE CAO JIANMING ON THE TWENTY-FOURTH SESSION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THETWELFTH NATIONAL PEOPLE’S CONGRESS ON NOVEMBER 5,2016,at http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/xinwen/2016-11/05/content_2001150.htm(Last visited on June 23,2017).
- 4 DATA COMES FROM FULLY ICE-BREAKING OF PILOT WORK ON PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION OF PROCURATORATE ORGANS,at http://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbt/201607/t20160718 152659.shtml(Last visited on June 23,2017)
- 5 DATA COMES FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE SUPREME PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA,at http://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201703/t20170303 183285.shtml(Last visited on June 23,2017).
- 6 Data is from briefing on pilot project of public interest litigations instituted by procuratorial organs in June,2017.
- 7 Liu Jialiang,Study on Pre-Trial Procedure of Civil Public Interest Litigation Instituted by Procuratorial Organs,5 Journal of Politics and Law 137(2017).
- 8 In the end of the pilot project,only the civil public interest litigation that People’s Procuratorates of Xuzhou,Jiangsu Province v.Hongshun Paper Inc.of Xuzhou,Jiangsu Province.This case finished its second sentence in December 2016.
- 9 Xie Zhiyong,Building Administrative Public Interest Litigation Needs to Clarify Five Questions,Procuratorial Daily,July 15,2015.
- (10) CHEN QINGXIU,ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW,at 130(Angle Publishing,2015).
- (11) Zhu Quanbao,On the Features,Models and Procedures of Procuratorial Organs Institute Administrative Public Interest Litigation,4Law Science Magazine 116(2015).
- (12) Hu Weilie&Tian Kai,Study on Pilot Project of Public Interest Litigation Instituted by Procuratorial Organs,2 Administrative Law Review 30(2017).
- (13) In this case,the court considered the people’s procuratorate of Xuzhou as the appellee(public interest litigator)in the second sentence,which distinguishes the people’s procuratorates with other ordinary appellees in the second sentence.This action considered characters of civil litigations and withheld the special name of“public interest litigator”by procuratorial organs in the first sentence.Procuratorial organs did not file pleadings in the procedures of the second sentence,so the court adopted direct judgments to adjudicate it.
- (14) “COMPREHENSIVE IMPLEMENTATIONS OF PROSECUTORIAL ORGANS FILE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION”PRESS CONFERENCE HELD BY THE SUPREME PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE,at http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfbh/qyxwfbh/Document/1557150/1557150.htm(Last visited on August 14,2017).
- (15) Zhang Buhong,Explanation of System of Proofing Rules in Administrative Litigations,4 Journal of National Prosecutors College45-46(2015).
- (16) FANG SHIRONG&SHI QIYOU,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW,at 147(Peking University Press,2015).
- (17) Wang Lanyu,Legal Nature and Classification Attribution of Incomplete Administrative Act,2 Journal of Politics and Law(2009).
- (18) Hu Weilie&Tian Kai,Study on Pilot Project of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Instituted by Procuratorial Organs,2Administrative Law Review 31(2017).
- (19) Qin Qianhong,Discussions on Questions about Theories and Practices of Procuratorial Organs Participate in Administrative Public Interest Litigations,11 Journal of Politics and Law 85(2016).
