摘要(Abstract)：
在目的理性的刑法体系之内,刑事政策被定位为方法论层面的合目的性考虑。这种体系性思想要求刑法解释论摆脱传统的范式,而实现向功能主义的刑法解释论的转型。功能主义的刑法解释论具有目的导向性、实质性、回应性与后果取向性的特点。由于倡导司法能动,功能主义的刑法解释论有助于解决风险社会背景下刑法体系的自我演进问题。
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation): the initial results of the National Social Science Fund Youth Project hosted by the author entitled Research on the Construction of Criminal Policy and Criminal Law Theory(11CFX061)
作者(Author): 劳东燕;Ou Xiaoqi;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1 Lao Dongyan,Criminal Policy Analysis of Criminal Norms:An Interpretation of Norms in the Sense of Criminal Law,1 China Legal Science(2011);Lao Dongyan,Criminal Policy and the Value Judgment in Criminal Interpretation,4 Tribune of Political Science and Law(2012);Du Yu,Criminal Policy and the Purpose Interpretation of Criminal Law,6 Legal Forum(2013);OUYANG BENQI,ONTHE TENDENCY OF TURNING CRIMINAL LAW INTERPRETATION INTO CRIMINAL POLICY,26 CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW,at 114-129(Peking University Press,2010);JIANG TAO,TENDENCY OF TURNING CRIMINAL LAW INTERPRETATION INTOCRIMINAL POLICY,30 CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW,at 406-434(Peking University Press,2012).
- 2 VGL.ROXIN,STRAFRECHT ALLGEMEINER TEIL,Band I,4 Aufl.,S.7,at 26(C.H.Beck,2006).
- 3 Lao Dongyan,Study on the Relationship between Criminal Policy and the Criminal Law System,2 Journal of Comparative Law(2012).
- 4 Chen Xingliang,The Relationship Between Criminal Law Doctrine and Criminal Policy:From Liszt’s Separation to Roxin’s Bridging,5 Peking University Law Journal 993(2013).
- 5 Chen Xingliang,Tendency of Turning Criminal Law into Criminal Policy and Its Limits,4 Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law 15(2013).
- 6 LISZT,TEXTBOOK OF GERMAN CRIMINAL LAW,at 2(Xu Jiusheng trans.,Law Press,2006).
- 7 CLAUS ROXIN,CRIMINAL POLICYAND THE CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM,at 13(Cai Guisheng trans.,Renmin University of China Press,2011).
- 8 XU NAIMAN,THE CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM AND CRIMINAL POLICY,in XU YUXIU&CHEN ZHIHUI,UNSWERVINGLYAND DETERMINEDLY DEDICATED TO LAW AND JUSTICE:A SELECTION OF PROFESSOR XU NAIMAN’S CRIMINAL LAWPAPERS,at 41(Wang Xiaowen trans.,Taiwan New Sharing Publishing Co.,Ltd.,2006).
- 9 Chen Xingliang,Methodology of Criminal Law Doctrine,2 Chinese Journal of Law 41(2005).
- 10 Gu Peidong,A Study on Several Issues of Judicial Activism,4 China Legal Science 8(2010).
- 11 Id.,10-13.
- 12 KARL LARENZ,METHODOLOGY OF LAW,at 210(Chen Ai’e trans.,The Commercial Press,2004).
- 13 Id.,210.
- 14 HUANG MAORONG,METHODOLOGY OF LEGAL SCIENCE AND MODERN CIVIL LAW,at 104(Law Press,2007).
- 15 KAUFMANN,PHILOSOPHY OF LAW,at 22-23(Liu Xingyi et al.trans.,Law Press,2004).
- 16 ZHANG MINGKAI,A TENTATIVE STUDY OF LEGAL INTEREST,at 216(China University of Political Science and Law Press,2003).
- 17 Wang Haiqiao&Ma Yuanjie,Reflections on Balance of Interest in the Change of China’s Criminal Law Interpretation Theory,5 Chinese Criminal Science 18(2012).
- 18 Professor Chen Xingliang proposed that within the limits of the principle of legality,criminal policy had the function of limiting the purpose,and would not expand the scope of crime,but rather limit the scope of crime.Chen Xingliang,supra note 4,1001.The author believes that if the above-mentioned point of view was made in a particular situation,there is no problem with such argument;conversely,if the assertion was generally made as to the basic function of criminal policy in terms of conformity with the purpose,then this argument is inevitably biased.
- 19 INGEBORG PUPPE,LEGAL THINKING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,at 78(Cai Shengwei trans.,Peking University Press,2011).
- 20 Li Bo,Study on the Criminal Law’s Theory Focusing on the Purpose of Normative Protection,33 Criminal Law Review 9(2013).
- 21 This provision was revised as article 39 of the Amendment(VIII)to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China on February 25,2011.
- 22 Article 8(The judicial interpretation was expressly annulled on April 4,2013)of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Theft Cases issued on March 10,1998 and article 3 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Robbery Cases implemented on November 28,2000.
- 23 REFERENCE TO CRIMINAL TRIAL(Vol.58),at 45-46(The First,Second,Third,Fourth and Fifth Criminal Trial Divisions of the Supreme People’s Court of People’s Republic of China ed.,Law Press,2008).
- 24 Id.,vol.27,23.
- 25 Zhao Bingzhi&Peng Xinlin,Reflections on the Legal Issues of the Xu Ting Case,14 Criminal Law Review 267-272(2008).
- 26 BERND RUTHERS,JURISPRUDENCE,at 60(Ding Xiaochun&Wu Yue trans.,Law Press,2003).
- 27 JIANG TAO,supra note 1,422.
- 28 INGEBORG PUPPE,supra note 19,78-79.
- 29 Sang Benqian,The Dilemma of Legal Interpretation,5 Chinese Journal of Law 11(2004).
- 30 Xu Defeng,The Application of Legal Doctrine,5 Peking University Law Journal 943(2013).
- 31 Id.,939-940.
- 32 Interpretation on paragraph 2 of article 93 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on April 29,2000 and the Interpretation on the Application of the Subject of Chapter IX Crimes of Dereliction of Duty of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China announced by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on December 28,2002.
- 33 REFERENCE TO CRIMINAL TRIAL(Vol.95),at 113-118(The First,Second,Third,Fourth and Fifth Criminal Trial Divisions of the Supreme People’s Court of People’s Republic of China ed.,Law Press,2014).
- 34 Id.,vol.98,125-130.
- 35 Lao Dongyan,supra note 1,39-40(2012).
- 36 Zhao Yunfeng,Charge Subjecting to Penalty:Reflection and Expansion of the Relationship between Crime and Punishment,7 Political Science and Law 9-18(2010);Jin Zegang&Yan Yi,Academic Interpretation of Charge Subjecting to Penalty,7 Political Science and Law 4-10(2010).
- 37 Liang Genlin,Analysis of the Norms and Legal Principle of the Xu Ting Case,1 Peking University Law Journal 5(2009).
- 38 Wang Huawei,Misreading and Rectification:Rational Existence Space of“Charge Subjecting to Penalty”,4 Global Law Review51-53(2015);Zhao Xi,“Reverse Restriction of Conviction to Sentencing”Does Not Violate the Principle of Legality,1 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)49-60(2015).
- 39 Gao Yandong,The Interactive Theory of Sentencing and Conviction:Charges Can Be Changed in Order to Achieve Sentencing Fairness,5 Modern Law Science 164-174(2009).
- 40 KARL LARENZ,supra note 12,359.
- 41 Lao Dongyan,supra note 1.
- 42 Zhou Zhe,Purpose Interpretation of Criminal Law in the Perspective of Criminal Policy,4 Peking University Law Journal 453(2007).
- 43 Du Yu,supra note 1,76.
- 44 Lenckner,Wertausfüllungsbedürftige Begriff im Strafrecht und der Satz Nullum Crimen Sine Lege,JuS(Juristische Schulung)256-257(1968).
- 45 KARL LARENZ,supra note 12,191.
- 46 Lao Dongyan,The Dilemma of the Certainty of the Principle of Legality and Its Way Out,6 Chinese Journal of Law 82(2004).
- 47 XU NAIMAN,AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IDEOLOGY OF THE CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM,in XU YUXIU&CHEN ZHIHUI,UNSWERVINGLY AND DETERMINEDLY DEDICATED TO LAW AND JUSTICE:A SELECTION OF PROFESSOR XUNAIMAN’S CRIMINAL LAW PAPERS,at 256(Xu Yuxiu trans.,Taiwan New Sharing Publishing Co.,Ltd.,2006).
- 48 Feng Jun,The Position and Method of Criminal Law Doctrine,1 Peking University Law Journal 184(2014).
- 49 Wang Haiqiao&Ma Yuanjie,Reflections on Balance of Interest in the Change of China’s Criminal Law Interpretation Theory,5 Chinese Criminal Science 16(2012).
- 50 Du Yu,supra note 1,77-78.
- 51 INGEBORG PUPPE,supra note 19,74.
- 52 Id.,77.
- 53 WARD FARNSWORTH,THE LEGAL ANALYST:A TOOLKIT FOR THINKING ABOUT THE LAW,at 1-10(Ding Zhihua trans.,Law Press,2009).
- 54 Jiang Tao,Consequence Examination and the Purpose Interpretation of Criminal Law,4 Tribune of Political Science and Law 97-99(2014).
- 55 Gu Peidong,supra note 10,22.
- 56 WARD FARNSWORTH,supra note 53,6.
- 57 BERND RUTHERS,supra note 26,147.
- 58 The Non-prosecution Decision of the Hunan Provincial People’s Procuratorate(Non-prosecution Decisions of the Procuratorate of Yuan)(2015)No.1.
- 59 HUANG MAORONG,supra note 14,48.
- 60 INGEBORG PUPPE,supra note 19,66.
- 61 In previous studies,the author has discussed this problem,arguing that there is a need to regulate the interpreter’s subjectivity by means of a dualistic control mechanism,namely,the internal control of the legal doctrine and the external control of constitutionality.Lao Dongyan,Reflection on the Methodology of the Purpose interpretation of Criminal Law,3 Tribune of Political Science and Law 85-90(2014).
