摘要(Abstract)：
I.THE AUTHORIZED CAPITAL SYSTEM AND THE CHANGE OF THE NATURE OF ISSUANCE RESOLUTIONS It is generally considered that different legal systems hold completely different attitude towards corporate capital.For example,the continental legal system adopts a legal capital system while the common law system adopts an authorized capital system.But actually,the legal capitalist
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): Chen Jingshan;Li Xiaoning;Yin Zhuoran;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1 Deng Feng,Evolution and System Design of Capital Constraint System:Taking the Comparison of the Chinese Company Law and American Company Law as the Core,1 China Legal Science(2009).
- 2 OKAMOTO CHIEKO,ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES BY STOCK FLOATATIO,at 48(published by the Tax Managers Association,2007).
- ③Omori Tadao,Ancestry of the Authorized Capital System,volume 57,at 53,No.1 Collected Essays of Law(1950).
- ④COMPANY LAW,at 229(Zhao Xudong ed.,Higher Education Press,2006).
- ⑤Yuan Chunlan,On the History and Capital System of the Company Law of England,10 China Economist(2005).
- ⑥The Statement of the author:this article does not distinguish stock and shares,and use“shares”in this article.
- ⑦Before the revision of the Company Act in 2005,the relative provisions of company laws stipulate in the Commercial Code of Japan,so quoting the provisions of the Japan’s company law before 2005should state as articles of the Commercial Code of Japan.But after the revision of the Company Act in 2005,company law is an independent law from the commercial law,and the legal provisions changed a lot,so quoting the provisions should state as articles of the Company Act.Due to the situations that many articles mix them up,this article makes an explanation here.In addition,the Company Act revised in 2005 allows disposition of Treasury Shares,so the concept of issuance of new shares is cancelled here and changed into“stock floatation”.
- ⑧OKAMOTO CHIEKO,supra note 2,131.
- ⑨HADAMA MASAMI,100 QUESTIONS OF THE NEW COMPANY ACT,at 96(Diamond Press,2005).
- A special preferential price,the original words is“a particularly beneficial price”,which refers to the situations that the subscriber purchases at a very low price.
- Yasuyoshi Tomiyama,Principle of the Preemptive Right to Subscribe New Shares in the American Company Law,34,volume 24,No.5 civil and commercial(1949).On the preemptive right to subscribe new shares,is can be seen from the Chinese materials,see LIU JUNHAI,PROTECTION OF SHAREHOLDER’S RIGHT IN STOCK COOPERATION,at 227(Law Press,2004).
- YOSHIMOTO KENICHI,NEW SHARE INSSUANCE MECHINISM AND LEGAL REGULATIONS,at 166(CHUOKEIZAI-SHA.INC.,2007).
- TAKYASU OKUSHIMA,CORPORATION GOVERNANCE AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY,at 396(The Institute for Financing Affairs Inc.,2007).
- YOSHIMOTO KENICHI,supra note 12,166.
- THE LATEST AMERICAN CORPORATION LAW(Shen Sibao ed.,Law Press,2006).
- MINORU TOKUMOTO,ON LEGAL PRINCIPLE OF HOSTILE ACQUISITION,at 51(Kyushu University Press,2000).
- The Companies Act of 1948,11 and 12 Geo.6,c.38.
- The Companies Act of 1980,c.22.
- GE WEIJUN,THE 2006 COMPANY ACT IN BRITAIN,at 364(The Law Press,2012).
- Note,The“Proper Purpose”Duty of Directors and Defensive Measures against Company Takeovers,10 Sydney L.Rev.627(1985).
- Frase v.Whalley,(1864)2 Hem&M.10;71 E.R.361.
- Punt v.Symons&Co.Ltd.,(1903)2 Ch.506.
- Piercy v.S.Mills&Co.Ltd.,(1920)1 Ch.77.
- Hogg v.Cramphorn Ltd.,(1967)Ch.254.
- The Case Law Times,No.493,at 53.
- Id.,No.443,144.
- Id.,No.1302,146.
- Id.,No.731,835.
- Id.,No.355,10.
- Id.,No.533,22.
- Id.,No.1323,48.
- Id.,No.1364,104.
- Id.,No.1317,28.
- Id.,No.1290,144.
- MORIMOTO SHIGERU,KAWAHAMA NOBORU,FIGHT OF RIGHT TO CONTROL IN CORPORATION AND OPERATION REGULATIONS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS,Civil and Commercial Volume 95,at 9;Shimura Harumi,FIGHT OF RIGHT TO CONTROL AND NEW SHARE ISSUANCE,in DEVELOPMENT OF THE CASE LAW OF COMPANY,at 254;and AOTAKE SHYOICHI,CRITERIA FOR UNFAIR ISSUANCE OF NEW SHARE,in SUBJECT AND DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN COMPANY ACT,at 161.
- TANAKA SEJI,ON COMPANY ACT(Sturdy Grass Study January,1994).
- SUZUKI TAKEO,STOP AND NULLITY OF NEW SHARES INSSUANCE,published on COMMERCIAL LAW STUDY III,at 227(Yuhikaku Publishing Co.Ltd.,1971).
- MORITA AKIRA,CAPITAL INCREASE TO THE THIRD PARTY AND BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE,in INVESTOR PROTECT,at 308(Original Publication Press,1989);and NAMIKI TOSHIMORI,ACQUISITION PREVENTION AND ORIENTATED ALLOTMENT OF SHARES,in MODERN BANKRUPTCY LAW AND ORIENTATED ALLOTMENT OF SHARES,at 653(1995).
- YAMAMOTO TAMESABURO,EFFICACY STUDY OF NEW SHARE ISSUANCE,published on[Japan]Collected Papers for mourning;TANAKA SEJI,SOCIAL FUNCTION OF COMPANY AND COMMERCIAL LAW,at 377(Economic Statutes Seminar Press,February 2003).
- TATSUTA MISAO,COMPANY ACT,at 181(Yuhikaku Publishing Co.Ltd.,1995).
