摘要(Abstract)：
本文以中国 2001 年以来法制发展为依据,阐述了中国在国内法律、行政规定和行政程序与世界贸易组织协定一致化进程中,制度构建、行政实施和司法审查诸方面的行政法问题。其中,保护世界贸易组织成员方贸易商的跨境贸易自由权,是作为传统国内公法部门的行政法接受世界贸易组织国际自由贸易规则的基础,也是经济全球化时代行政法的基本功能之一和行政法制度变迁的重心所在。尤其是行政机关对境内国际服务贸易和对进口货物的再生产和销售活动的后边境管理,是国内行政法与国际自由贸易规则高度结合并受到极大改造的领域。世界贸易组织协定能够对中国国内法行政法产生重大影响的基本原因,在于接受世界贸易组织规则是中国对外开放和改革经济制度的组成部分,基于市场体制的经济自主权和国际贸易权成为国内行政法的正当性基础。
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 于安;Ma Junying;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- ①1ERNST-ULRICH PETERSMANN,CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMSOF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW,at 65 ( He Zhipeng trans.,Higher Education Press,2004).
- ②2Id.,276.
- ③3Id.,1.
- ④4David Price,Allyson M Pollock,Jean Shaoul,How the World Trade Organization is Shaping DomesticPolicies in Health Care,345 The LANCET 1889,1889-1891 ( 1999).
- ⑤5The discussion on relevant issues can be seen in Zhan Meibo: Open Society and the ConstitutionalDevelopment of Modern China,published inJournal of Wuhan University ( social science edition),Vol5,2003; Economic Globalization: The Way to Modern Constitution,published in Journal of WuhanUniversity ( social science edition),Vol 2,2004.
- ①6Chen Qingtai,Institutional Transition and Government Reform under the Background of EconomicGlobalization,41 Development and Research Communication of Tsinghua University 1,2-3 ( 2001).
- ②7DAVID M.KOTZ,GLOBALIZATION AND NEOLIBERALISM,QUOTED IN GLOBALIZATIONAND NEOLIBERALISM,at 7-9 ( Li Qingq ed.,Guangxi Normal University Press,2003).
- ③8JACQUES ADDA: ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION,at 136 ( He Jing et al.,trans.,CentralCompilation and Translation Press,2002).
- ①9Cao Kangtai,Director of Legislative Affairs Office of State Council:“Performing the Commitment ofAccession to WTO Strictly and Promoting Administration according to Law”,Legal Daily,Dec.11,2004,at front page.
- ②10YU GUANGZHOU,REPORT ON THE RELEVANT CONDITIONS SINCE CHINA JOINED WTOin THE SIXTH MEETING OF THE TENTH NATIONAL PEOPLE'S CONGRESS STANDINGCOMMITTEE,Dec.15,2003.
- ①11Robert Post,The Challenge of Globalization to American Public Law Scholarship,2 TheoreticalInquiries in Law 1,5 and 7 ( 2001).With regards to this title,the author mentioned the followingrelevant works: for a good summary of the emergence of such international legal norms,see PatrickTangney,The New Internationalism: Ceding Sovereign Competences to Supranational Organizationsand Constitutional Change in the United States and Germany,21 Yale J.Int’l L 395 ( 1996) ; JohnC.Yoo,Globalism and the Constitution: Treaties,Non-Self-Execution,and the OriginalUnderstanding,99 Colum.L.Rev.1955 ( 1999).On the domestic deficit of such organizations,Patti Goldman: The democratization of the Development of United States Trade Policy,27 CornellInt’l L.J.631( 1994) ; Robert F.Housman,Democratizing International Trade Decision-Making,27 Cornell Int’l L.J.699 ( 1994).
- ①12Supra note 1,134.
- ①13Cao Kangtai,supra note 9,1-2.
- ②14UNITED STATES: IMPORT PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN SHRIMP AND SHRIMPPRODUCTS,at 1040-1042 ( Zhao Weitian ed.,Shanghai People's Publishing House,2003 )
- ①15COMMENT AND ANALYSIS ON WTO DISPUTE CASES 1995-2002,at 131-154 ( Zhu Lanye ed.,Law Press,2004).
- ②16HAN LIYU,AMERICAN FOREIGN TRADE LAW,at 7 ( Law Press,1999).
- ①17Article X 3( B) of GATT provides:“Each contracting party shall maintain,or institute as soon aspracticable,judicial,arbitral or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose,inter alia,ofthe prompt review and correction of administrative action relating to customs matters.Such tribunalsor procedures shall be independent of the agencies entrusted with administrative enforcement and theirdecisions shall be implemented by,and shall govern the practice of,such agencies unless an appealis lodged with a court or tribunal of superior jurisdiction within the time prescribed for appeals to belodged by importers; Provided that the central administration of such agency may take steps to obtaina review of the matter in another proceeding if there is good cause to believe that the decision isinconsistent with established principles of law or the actual facts.”The item C provides:“Theprovisions of subparagraph (b ) of this paragraph shall not require the elimination or substitution ofprocedures in force in the territory of a contracting party on the date of this Agreement which in factprovide for an objective and impartial review of administrative action even though such procedures arenot fully or formally independent of the agencies entrusted with administrative enforcement.Anycontracting party employing such procedures shall,upon request,furnish the CONTRACTINGPARTIES with full information thereon in order that they may determine whether such proceduresconform to the requirements of this subparagraph.”
- ②18Such as article XIII of Anti-dumping Agreement,article 23 of Agreement on Subsidies andCountervailing Measures,article 11 of Agreement on Customs valuation,article VI of GeneralAgreement on Trade in Services,and article 41 of Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects ofIntellectual Property Rights.
- ①19Article XIII of Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 of WTO.
- ①20Jean Marie Woehring,Die franzoesische Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit im Verleich mit der deutschen,NVwZ 1998,Heft 5,S.463.
- ②21HUFEN FRIEDHELM: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW,at 24-26 ( Mo Guanghua trans.,Law Press,2003).
- ③22JEAN MARIE WOEHRING,supra note 20,464.
