作者：王志刚
作者介绍：重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院教授
出版日期：2026年10月9日
内容提要 数字技术的发展和犯罪形态的变化催生了刑事侦查中的公私合作，但其法治化程度有所不足。实践中，刑事侦查中的公私合作大致可以分为义务型、契约型和边缘型合作。刑事侦查公私合作对现行程序法治的冲击主要体现在权力配置合法性缺失、权力运行控制弱化和诉讼结构中的控辩失衡。对此，可通过重塑合法性根基、建构运行过程控制体系和确立权利保障机制三个方面作出制度回应，系统解决刑事侦查公私合作中的权力行使合法性、审批程序、过程监控、控辩平衡、监督与救济等问题，将技术效能纳入程序法治的可控框架。
关键词 刑事侦查 公私合作 合作型侦查 第三方技术协助 程序规制
Abstract: The development of digital technology and changes in the forms of crime have given rise to public-private partnerships in criminal investigations, but the legal process has lagged significantly. In practice, public-private partnerships in criminal investigations can be roughly divided into obligatory, contractual, and marginal cooperation. The impact of public-private partnerships on the existing procedural rule of law system is mainly reflected in the lack of legitimacy in the allocation of power, the weakening of control over the exercise of power, and the imbalance between prosecution and defense in the litigation structure. To address this, institutional responses can be made in three aspects: reshaping the foundation of legitimacy, constructing a system for controlling the operational process, and establishing a rights protection mechanism. This will systematically resolve issues related to the legitimacy of power exercise, approval procedures, process monitoring, balance between prosecution and defense, and supervision and remedies in public-private partnerships, thus incorporating technological effectiveness into a controllable framework of procedural rule of law.