作者：冯术杰
作者介绍：清华大学法学院副教授，法学博士
出版日期：2016年8月9日
内容提要 网络侵权法领域的"应知"应涵盖过失和故意两种过错形态。既有的法律规则将欧美法上网络服务提供者免责条款中的过错概念用于侵权责任构成条款,导致法律解释和适用的混乱以及免责条款的适用范围扩大。对于网络服务提供者的"过失",应以"采取合理、有效的侵权预防措施"的注意义务来定义,而不必考察其对网络用户侵权行为的实际知晓情况。即便不构成帮助侵权,过失间接侵权产生连带责任的规则也符合我国侵权责任法的理论和规范体系。
关键词 网络服务提供者责任 间接侵权 过失 网络侵权
Abstract: Legal awareness in the field of network tort law should cover two fault forms, namely, negligence and deliberation. The existing legal rules apply the concept of fault in exception clause for network service provider in Euro American law into the clause of constitute of tort liability, resulting in the confusion of legal interpretation and application and the expansion of application scope of exception clause. "Negligence" of network service provider should be defined as the duty of care of "taking reasonable and effective preventive measures for tort" , without investigating the actual knowledge and awareness of its infringement act on network users. Even if indirect negligence does not constitute contributory infringement, the rule that it produces joint and several liabilities conforms to the theoretical and standard systems of China's law on the liability of infringement.