作者：俞祺
作者介绍：北京大学法学院助理教授，法学博士
出版日期：2018年12月9日
内容提要 新《行政诉讼法》规定的"复议机关作共同被告"制度是否促进了行政复议制度实效性的提升,是一个重要但有争议的问题。体现制度改革成功与否的标准从成效角度说包括复议直接纠错率、复议再诉率、复议案件数量等,从成本角度说包括改革本身的成本和改革所带来的成本。基于对现有数据以及访谈材料的综合比对并排除其他假设后,可以判断,在理性选择机制的作用下,复议机关作共同被告制度取得了较好的效果。与功能目标相似但复议机关不用作共同被告的其他方案相比,该制度总体成本更低,相对更符合我国当前的国情。
关键词 行政诉讼法 行政复议 共同被告 成本收益分析
Abstract: The recently revised Administrative Litigation Law provides a new system making the reconsideration organ as a codefendant with the original agency. Whether the new system improves the efficiency of administrative reconsideration practice is an important but controversial question. Standards which indicate the successfulness of the reform consist of two aspects. In terms of effect, they include rate of direct correction, rate of litigation after reconsideration and number of reconsideration cases. In terms of cost, they include the cost of reform and the cost brought by the reform. Based on data and interviews, many assumptions are excluded while a conclusion could be reasonably drawn that the new system does quite well and archive its goal under the rational choice mechanism. This arrangement cost less and is more suitable to the current situation of our country compared with systems aiming at similar goals but the reconsideration organ does not need to be a codefendant.