作者：刘福元
作者介绍：东北财经大学法学院副教授，法学博士
出版日期：2018年6月9日
内容提要 为系统性地拆解"执法-抗法"这一双输格局,各地方城管普遍采用了比较温和的柔性或非强制执法手段;由于其在实践中呈现出鲜明的灵活性和多样性特征,使得"城管柔性执法"存在着"多重面相",主要包括:行政指导等常规手段及作为其变种的花样执法、信用机制的基础形态和高级形态、居于执法边缘的"和谐共处",以及为相对人"根本解决问题"等。通过对诸面相分别进行案例分析和效益量化可知,任何一种面相都未呈现出完美的效益曲线并存在着明显的实践困境,因此在城管的具体执法情景中,应当根据综合效益、特殊指标、执法领域等因素对诸面相进行"优先级"设置。
关键词 城市管理 柔性执法 效益考量 优先级设置
Abstract: To break through lose-lose situation between the law enforcement and law resistance in a systematic manner, local urban management officers generally adopt flexible or non-compulsory means of law enforcement. Due to the features of flexibility and diversity in practice, flexible law enforcement of urban management officers has diverse forms, including the conventional manners like administrative guidance and humanity-based law enforcement, the basic and senior forms of credit mechanism, co-existence at the edge of law enforcement and solving problems at source for the concerned person, etc. Case analysis on and the benefit quantification of all forms of law enforcement show that none of them has the perfect benefit curve, instead, all of them have the obvious dilemma in practice. Therefore, it is required to make the priority setting in the specific law enforcement scenario of urban management officers according to the comprehensive benefits, special index and law enforcement field, etc.