Qin Liwei
For the fi rst time, China promulgated normative legal documents on the theme of ‘network algorithm’, laying a legislative foundation for further practice of algorithm regulation, especially the construction of legal obligations of network algorithm recommendation service providers. From the perspective of legal sources, the current administrative regulations have such weaknesses as the low level of legal effect, lack of support and guidance of the civil basic law, small number and non-systematic distribution of other legal sources, and insufficient accumulation of judicial practice and theoretical achievements. It is necessary to improve the legislative level of algorithm governance and strive to link key provisions such as the principle of ‘algorithms for good’ and information security obligations with the Civil Code and integrate them into the institutional system of the civil basic law.
内容提要：中国首次颁布以“网络算法”为主题的规范性法律文件，为进一步实践 算法规制，特别是构建网络算法推荐服务提供者的法定义务奠定了立法基础。从法律渊 源角度看，目前的行政规章存在法律效力层级较低、民事基本法的支撑和指引不足、其 它法律渊源数量较少且非体系化分布、司法实践和学说成果积累不够等弱点。因此，有 必要提高算法治理的立法层级，努力将“算法向善”原则和信息安全义务等关键条款与 民法典对接，融入民事基本法的制度体系中。