Sang Yuanke
Arbitration is the most preferred procedural method for resolving cross-border commercial disputes in the present context, primarily because the 1958 New York Convention fundamentally ensures the universal enforceability of arbitral awards. From 1987 to 2024, the New York Convention had been in force in China for 37 years and had been well implemented, as a majority of foreign arbitral awards were recognized and enforced by the Chinese courts. Regardless, the phenomenon of inappropriate application and misunderstanding of the New York Convention still exists in judicial practice. This article begins with the specific data analysis of Chinese court decisions, next followed by the outline of the main jurisprudence summarized from those decisions. The last part is intended to propose specifi c refi nements so as to render it consistent with the text and spirit of the New York Convention.
内容提要：仲裁是当前解决跨境商事争议最受欢迎的程序性机制，这主要归因于 1958 年《纽约公约》为仲裁裁决的全球执行提供了根本保障。自 1987 年至 2024 年，《纽 约公约》在中国已生效 37 年并得到了有效实施，绝大多数外国仲裁裁决均获得了中国 法院的承认与执行。然而，司法实践中仍然存在不当适用和解释《纽约公约》的现象。 本文首先论述中国法院裁判决定的具体分析数据，其次阐述中国法院裁判决定所蕴含的 主要裁判立场，最后旨在提出具体的完善意见，以使其符合《纽约公约》的文本与精神。