Chen Meng
Based on the traditional jurisdiction theory and the ‘effect test’, legislation and judicial practice of various countries have confi rmed the extraterritoriality of different domestic public laws. Both fragmented and systematized modes of extraterritoriality have increased the legal, political, and economic confl icts between diff erent countries and brought unprecedented challenges to the multilateral system and international dispute resolution. Due to the lack of governance mechanism, the aff ected countries, foreign individuals, and entities can only resort to domestic judicial and administrative proceedings based on international comity and reciprocity principles. In this context, un der the framework of the Law on Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China, China can develop mechanisms at both national and international levels and promote the reform of international laws and dispute resolution to govern and regulate expanding extraterritoriality.
内容提要：以传统管辖权理论和“效果原则”为基础，部分国内公法的域外效力得 到了各国立法和司法实践的认可。无论是碎片式还是体系化的国内法域外效力模式都不 同程度上增加了不同国家间的法律、政治和经贸冲突，也为当今多边体制和国际争端解 决机制带来前所未有的挑战。由于相关治理机制的缺失，受到影响的国家、外国个人和 实体仅可以通过参与执法国内部司法和行政程序，并依据国际礼让原则和对等原则等一 些国际法基本原则和执法国国内的司法裁量标准，来请求执法机关审慎执行本国法的域 外适用。在这一背景下，中国可以在《对外关系法》框架下，通过区分不同类型的国内法， 来确定国内法域外效力，并促进国内法域外冲突国际实体规则和争端解决机制的变革， 形成动态发展的全球治理机制。