作者：张平华
作者介绍：烟台大学法学院教授
出版日期：2013年4月9日
内容提要 人格权具有立体式的利益结构，其内核是基于人格要素内在本质而生的固有利益，外围则是超越内在本质的衍生利益，即信赖利益、公共利益、载体利益、牵连利益等。立体式的利益结构易使人格权边界模糊，在法律解释和人格权法定两项基本应对路径中，后者更具基础意义。依照固有利益的本质属性，为实现人格权的具体化，人格权应坚持类型强制。人格权类型固定有利于明确衍生利益的范围，提高责任法的操作性。人格权法定并不是绝对的，类型强制具有非封闭性，类型固定的基本手段是例示主义。
关键词 人格权 人格利益 权利冲突 人格权法定
Abstract: Personality rights have stereo structure of interests, the inherent interest decided by the nature of personality factors is its inner core, and the derivative interest that deviates from the inner nature lies in the outside, including reliance interest, public interest, carrier interest, involvement interest, and other interests. Stereo structure of interests makes the border of personality rights obscure. The judicial interpretation and legalizing personality rights are two ways to solve this issue, but the latter is more fundamental. In order to materialize personality rights, personality rights should be classified compulsorily according to the essential attributes of inherent interest. This will be beneficial to clarifying the scope of derivative interest and enhancing the operability of liability law. The legalization of personality rights should not be absolute, which means compulsory classification has the characteristic of non-closure, and the main way to fix the classification is the illustration.