作者：黄 卉
作者介绍：北京航空航天大学法学院副教授,德国洪堡大学法学博士
出版日期：2014年2月9日
内容提要 所谓合宪性解释, 是指我国各级人民法院在对个案裁判所适用的法律进行解释时, 当将宪法原则和精神纳入考量范围。目前若要推广合宪性解释理论并付诸实践, 则必须而且可以在法学方法论框架内, 尤其通过体系解释和目的解释, 纠正关于全国人大常委会享有专属宪法解释权以及法院不能解释宪法的错误认识学界也应积极联合司法界共同努力, 解决司法界普遍缺乏合宪性解释的动力和技术的问题。
关键词 合宪性解释 宪法司法化 宪法解释专属权 法学方法论
Abstract:After the fail of the constitutional judicature movement in 2008, the constitutional academia did not stop to endeavor to let the constitution to the judicatory practice. The most remarkable result is the reviving the theory of the interpretation of the constitutionality which is considered the sequel of the judicature movement. According to this theory, the people's courts at all levels in our country, when interpreting laws applied individual cases, should take the constitutional principle and spirit into consideration. In most possible interpretation, the one according to the Constitution should be the first one. Currently, to promote and take into practice of the theory of the interpretation of the constitutionality, we must correct the misunderstanding that the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress has the exclusive constitutional interpretation right and the courts cannot interpret the Constitution in the framework of the legal theory, especially through systematic interpretation and teleological interpretation. And the academia should positively make alliance of the judicial circles, take lessons from the foreign experience and summarize the local experience, in order to solve the impetus and technic problems of the interpretations of constitutionality which the judicial circles lack.