作者：陈 实
作者介绍：中南财经政法大学法学院讲师,中南财经政法大学法治发展与司法改革研究中心研究人员
出版日期：2014年2月9日
内容提要 律师庭外言论可能损害当事人及其他诉讼参与者的权益, 并危及公正审判。已有案例充分证明, 在我国特殊的社会背景和司法体制下, 律师庭外言论的贻害无法通过诉讼救济措施消除。基于律师诉讼参与者的谨慎义务和防止审前信息过度、不当传播而对律师的庭外言论进行规制已是诸多法治国刑事司法中的通行做法, 但在不同的刑事审判方式和司法环境中, 需要规制的律师庭外言论内容有所不同。我国应在借鉴国际相关规则经验的基础上构建律师庭外言论规则。
关键词 律师庭外言论 律师庭外言论规则 底线标准模式
Abstract: The lawyers' extrajudicial statements may damage the rights and interests of litigants and other litigant parties, and endanger the fair trial. Some cases prove that, under China's special social background and judicial system, the damages caused by lawyers' extrajudicial statements cannot be eliminated by lawsuit remedies. In order to prevent excessive and inappropriate dissemination of information before the trial, regulating the lawyers' extrajudicial statements in criminal justice has become a prevalent way in many countries on the basis of lawyers' prudent obligation, but in different criminal judicial ways and judicial environments, the contents of lawyers' extrajudicial statements, that need to be regulated, are also different.China should establish the rules for lawyers' extrajudicial statements in criminal justice by borrowing relevant experiences of international rules.