作者：封安波
作者介绍：浙江大学光华法学院助理研究员、法学博士后
出版日期：2014年2月9日
内容提要 “媒体公诉”和“自媒体辩护”是当前我国刑事司法与媒体关系的两大突出问题, 是刑事诉讼的“中国式问题”。本文解析了“媒体公诉”在我国刑事司法的具体现象和存在原因, 解析了“自媒体辩护”的成因及利弊, 以案例实证分析了“媒体公诉”与“自媒体辩护”的博弈, 并探讨了有关“媒体公诉”和“自媒体辩护”的对策。得出初步结论:“媒体公诉”和“自媒体辩护”治本之道在于公安司法机关应在刑事司法程序内行使法定职权, 保障嫌疑人 (被告人) 各项诉讼权利, 律师则相应地在法律程序之内行使辩护权。
关键词 转型社会 “媒体公诉” “自媒体辩护”
Abstract: “Media public prosecution”and “we- media defense”are now two prominent issues in the relationship between China's criminal justice and the media, and which are the“issues with Chinese characteristic”in the field of criminal prosecution. This article analyzes the specific phenomenon and existed reason of the “media public prosecution”in China's criminal justice, the cause of formation, advantages and disadvantages of the“we- media defense”, and the game playing between the “media public prosecution”and the “we- media defense”by case studies, and discusses the relevant countermeasures of the “media public prosecution”and the“we- media defense”. This article draws a conclusion that: in order to eradicate the “Media public prosecution”and the “we- media defense”, the public security and judicial organs shall exercise their statutory powers in criminal judicial procedure and safeguard the suspects' litigant rights.