作者：闫尔宝
作者介绍：南开大学法学院副教授，法学博士
出版日期：2014年12月9日
内容提要 我国行政诉讼法的修订理论上存在两条不同的路径: 一是明定基本法律概 念含义，针对不同行政争议分别设置对应的行政诉讼类型，合理设计不同行政诉讼案件的 审理规则，最终实现行政诉讼制度运作与行政行为学理的有序衔接与双向互动; 一是以含 义宽泛的行政行为概念统领行政诉讼法全文，将行政诉讼类型划分、审理规则的选择适用 完全交由司法实务操作。对照日本法实践中当事人诉讼活用论的问题意识与理论主张，可 以认为，第一条修法路径既能实现法律修订所追求的扩大对相对人权益救济的目的，又能 提升我国行政行为法理论的研究水平，在制度设计与学理建构之间更容易建立有序衔接， 值得引起注意。
关键词 行政诉讼法修订 行政活动形式 行政诉讼类型 当事人诉讼活用论
Abstract: In theory，there are two different paths to amend administrative procedure law in China: one is to define the basic legal concepts clearly， establish corresponding administrative litigation types for different administrative disputes，design rational trial rules， and finally achieve the link between the administrative act law theory and the relief act system design; the other one is to use the broad meaning of the concept of administrative act command full text of the Administrative litigation legislation，divide different types of administrative litigation，and let the judicial practice to carry out the task of dividing the administrative disputes and selecting procedure rules． Compared to the opinion of active application of the Litigants Suit in Japan，the first path of amending the law can not only achieve the purpose of relief relative rights，but also enhance the research level of our administrative acts theory and build an orderly convergence between the system design with theoretical construct，so it is worthy of adoption．