作者：胡学军
作者介绍：南昌大学法学院教授，博士生导师
出版日期：2019年4月9日
内容提要 我国证明责任研究长期以来聚焦于证明责任在主体间的分配，而忽略了证明责任分配客体的具体指涉，因此常在现实案件中陷入误区。证明责任并非为解决证据短缺导致的生活事实“模糊不清”，生活事实“模糊不清”亦不宜作证明责任裁判。本质上，证明责任针对的是抽象规范对应具体案件事实的法律适用困境。证明责任的对象应从生活事实重新回归定位为法律要件事实。相应地，证明责任的主观涵义应从对生活事实的举证证明，转向作为法律适用核心环节的案件事实与规范要件相连接的归属论证。
关键词 证明责任 生活事实 法律要件 要件事实 真伪不明
Abstract: The study of burden of proof in China has long focused on the distribution of burden of proof among the parties, but neglects the specific reference of the object of burden of proot, so it often talls into a misunderstanding in practical cases. In fact, the burden of proof is not to solve the "ambiguity" of daily life facts caused by the lack of evidence, this situation should not be judged by the burden of proof. In essence, the burden of proof is aimed at the dilemma of legal application of abstract norms corresponding to the facts of specific cases. The object of burden of proof should be regressed from the fact of life to the fact of law. Accordingly, the subjective meaning of the burden of proof should be changed from the proof of the facts of life to the attribution and argumentation of the connection between the facts of the case and the elements of norms as the core link of the application of the law.