作者：程雷
作者介绍：中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心副教授
出版日期：2019年4月9日
内容提要 2018年10月立法机关对《刑事诉讼法》进行了第三次修正，旨在实现职务犯罪案件办理过程中《刑事诉讼法》与《监察法》的顺畅衔接，但遗憾的是此次修正对若干衔接问题采取了回避的态度，半年多来的《监察法》实施实践亦表明，法法衔接仍然存在着三项难题:监察案件是否应当办理刑事立案手续;退回补充调查期间强制措施的衔接;监察证据是否适用非法证据排除规则。回应上述中国式问题，需要理论创新，作为破解之道应当确立形式性立案审查制度、坚持“人事合一”的诉讼客体理论、从监察调查系取证行为的本质出发，践行《联合国反酷刑公约》的国际义务，明确非法证据排除规则的适用。
关键词 监察法 刑事诉讼法 监察机关 法法衔接
Abstract: Legislators revised the Criminal Procedure Law in October 2018 for the third time in order to realize the coordination between the Criminal Procedure Law and the Supervision Law. Unfortunately, the law revision process did not meet the challenges from the practice and there are still three main challenges for the coordination in the past over half year's law enforcement as below: firstly, whether or not those cases investigated by the supervision committee should have the case filing procedure; secondly, how to coordinate compulsory measures when such cases are turned back to the investigation stage of supervision committee; lastly, whether or not the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence can be applied to the supervision committee's cases. To solve such Chinese problems, the solutions can be formal case filing procedure, combination of case and the charged as case target and the application of exclusionary rule of illegal evidence according to the UN Convention against Torture.