作者：储槐植 何群
作者介绍：储槐植，北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院特聘教授，博士生导师。何群，福州大学法学院副教授，北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院博士后。
出版日期：2019年6月9日
内容提要 犯罪概念的定量因素是我国刑法的创制，因此，在我国刑法中运用数学方法构建数量刑法学，对我国刑法学的现代化发展具有重大意义。数量刑法学旨在借助数学方法量化罪刑关系，以促进司法实践，努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平正义。概言之，数量刑法学通过研究并科学化刑法数量关系，经由罪刑量化解析，以期达致罪刑均衡之正义境界。数量刑法学具有提升司法效率、精确刑罚配置、科学刑罚结构等功能。随着近代学派预防刑思想对刑法的影响，刑罚个别化思想在各国刑事立法和司法领域已被不同程度地接受，因此，很难找到某种绝对且各国通行的公式对刑罚配置进行数值化演算。但是，随着实证研究、大数据、人工智能的运用，以及数量刑法学的发展，罪刑均衡可以通过科学精确的配刑模型得以有效实现。
关键词 数量刑法学 定量因素 罪刑均衡 人工智能 一体化思维
Abstract: Compared to the principle of legality of crimes and punishments, the research on the principle of balance between crimes and punishments, which impacts Chinese justice more directly, is highly insufficient in Chinese criminal jurisprudence. Quantitative elements in crime concept are the creation of Chinese criminal law, so the development of quantitative criminal jurisprudence is of great significance to Chinese criminal jurisprudence. Quantitative criminal jurisprudence aims to promote judicial practice and make the people feel justice and fairness in each judicial case by quantifying relationships between crimes and punishments with mathematical methods. In general, the quantitative criminal jurisprudence aims to realize the balance of crime and punishment by researching the quantitative relation in the criminal law. The quantitative criminal jurisprudence can improve judicial efficiency, penalty allocation accuracy, and penalty structure rationality. With the influence of the modern school on the criminal law, the thought of individualization penalty has been accepted in the criminal legislation and judicial fields of various countries in different degrees. Therefore, it is difficult to find an absolute and nationally accepted formula to numerically calculate the allocation of penalties. However, with the development of empirical research, big data, artificial intelligence, and quantitative criminal jurisprudence, the balance of crime and punishment can be effectively achieved through scientific and accurate models of punishment.