作者：王敬波
作者介绍：中国政法大学法治政府研究院教授，博士生导师
出版日期：2019年6月9日
内容提要 行政诉讼法明确将行政协议纳入受案范围。行政协议效力以及无效行政协议的认定涉及法院审理行政协议案件的法律适用。公私法规则在关于合同效力的价值取向上存在对极冲突，因此，无论是同时还是单独适用行政诉讼法或者民事法律，均无法搭建逻辑周延的行政协议的效力框架。与此同时，公法和私法在法律原则、法律规范等方面仍然存在相互融通并具备提取效力认定的公因式提供可能性。以违法作为无效的起点，无效行政协议的标准介于单方行政行为无效标准和民事合同无效标准之间。以列举形式在行政主体资格、私方合同当事人资格、协议内容、协议程序方面建构无效行政协议的标准，是解决理论和实践难题的出路。
关键词 行政协议 效力模型 无效标准
Abstract: The Administrative Procedure Law explicitly incorporates administrative agreements into the scope of administrative litigation. The validity of administrative agreement and the identification of invalid administrative agreement are involved in the legal application by court in judging administrative agreement cases. There is a conflict between public law and private law on the value orientation of contract effectiveness. Therefore, no matter whether the administrative procedure law or the civil law is applied simultaneously or separately, it is impossible to construct a validity framework for administrative agreement which is logically distributed. Meanwhile, in terms of legal principles and legal norms, the public law and private law still have mutual compatibility, and this provides a possibility to extracting the common factor of effectiveness affirmation. Regard illegality as the starting point of invalidity, the standard of invalid administrative agreement is between the unilateral administrative act invalidation standard and the civil contract invalidation standard. The way out to solve the theoretical and practical problems is to establish the standard of invalid administrative agreement by enumeration in terms of administrative subject qualification, private party qualification, agreement content, as well as agreement procedure.