作者：张淑芳
作者介绍：上海财经大学法学院教授，博士生导师
出版日期：2019年8月9日
内容提要 公私法相互渗透是社会发展过程中的必然现象，进入21 世纪以来，这一现 象越来越普遍、 越来越深刻。主要表现为私法渗入公法的范围越来越广、 内容越来越具体， 而且日益有序。二者关系的相对性是私法能够渗入公法的逻辑前提，但并不等于私法和公 法可以完全融为一体。当今社会机制之下也许二者不一定泾渭分明，但至少还是有界限 的， 应当各自有着自身的质的规定性，一定程度上它们的区分是客观的。由此得出的结论 是:私法渗入公法是必然而有益的，但私法渗入公法也应当是有边界的。为此，目前情形 下，必须强调公法不能被私法取代、 公法体系不能被改变、 公法自身主流不能被改变、 公法 不能被私法规模化渗入。即私法对公法的渗入是非整体性的、 非体系化的，可以表现为个 别理念、 个别原则、 个别环节等的渗入。
关键词 私法渗入 边界限制 公法主流 公法体系
Abstract: Mutual penetration of public and private law is an inevitable phenomenon in the process of social development. Since the beginning of 21st Century, the administrative law as public law in the typical sense has been infiltrated more and more widespread and deep by private law. The main manifestation is that the scope of private law infiltrating into public law is more and more wide, the content is more and more specific, and it is increasingly orderly. The spirit of contract is the logical premise that private law can infiltrate into public law, but it does not mean that private law and public law can be fully integrated. In terms of the specific circumstances of the rule of law practice, they may not distinct but at least have boundaries. They should each have their own qualitative prescriptiveness and the distinction is objective to a certain extent. It can conclude that the infiltration of private law into public law is inevitable and beneficial, but it should also have boundary. Under current circumstances, public law cannot be replaced by private law, public law system cannot be changed, the mainstream of public law cannot be changed, and public law cannot be infiltrated by private law. The infiltration of public law into public law is not holistic and systematic, and can be expressed as the infiltration of individual ideas, individual principles, individual links, etc.