联系我们
|
加入收藏
论刑事诉讼法的法典化
时间:2026-04-30
来源:
作者:

作者:陈卫东

 

作者介绍:中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心教授

 

出版日期:2021年6月9日

 

内容提要 法典化是立法的一种高级形式,它具有将部门法律规范完备化与体系化的法 治功能。由于未经法典化的编纂程序,我国《刑事诉讼法》的完备性与体系性明显不足,徒有 法典之形式而无法典之内涵,直接引发了法外规范大规模膨胀与法律虚化的问题。为了完善 中国特色社会主义法律体系、推进刑事司法治理体系的现代化、落实“以审判为中心”的诉讼 制度改革、实现刑事诉讼制度的跨越式发展,就必须构建完备而体系的规范集合,达致刑事诉 讼法真正意义上的法典化。就法典化的原则而言,刑事诉讼法的法典化应当围绕正当程序原 则、审判中心原则、诉讼效率原则展开。《刑事诉讼法》在框架上的弊病,集中在基于“分工负 责”而产生的职能化立法思路方面,允宜以破除职能化为导向进行法典化的构建。

关键词 刑事诉讼法 法典化 完备化 体系化 治理体系

 

Abstract: Codification is an advanced form of legislation, which has the legal function of making the departmental laws and norms completed and systematized. Due to the lack of codification procedures, the completeness and systematicity of China’s Criminal Procedure  Law are obviously insufficient, which directly leads to the problems of large-scale expansion on extra-legal norms and emptiness on the law itself. In order to improve the socialist system of laws with Chinese characteristics, promote the modernization of the criminal justice governance system, implement the‘trial-centered’litigation system reform, and realize the leapfrog development of the criminal litigation system, it is necessary to construct a complete and systematic set of norms to achieve the codification of criminal procedure law. As far as the principle of codification is concerned, the codification of the criminal procedure law should be carried out around the principles of due process, trial centrality and procedural efficiency. The deficiencies in the framework of the Criminal Procedure Law are concentrated on the functional legislative concept based on the‘division of labor and responsibility’, and it is advisable to realize the codification based on the elimination of functionalization.


友情链接
LINKS
中国法学杂志社 版权所有©2025
备案号:京ICP备10012170号-1 京公安网备: 11040102700011号
Copyright © 2025,China Law Society
办公地址:北京市海淀区皂君庙4号院 邮编:100081