作者：赵 宏
作者介绍：中国政法大学法学院教授
出版日期：2020年8月9日
内容提要 保护规范理论在被纳入我国行政审判后，为行政诉讼利害关系人的判定提 供了全新参考，但也同样引发质疑和争议。除常见的因解释规则的芜杂导致的适用不确定、 因强调个人利益保护指向导致的适用严苛，以及因“一般法依赖”所引发的立法专断外，保 护规范理论在我国所遭受的质疑还包括是否与行政诉讼整体定位相匹配，是否适应行政诉 讼的现实发展等考量。这些争议的产生部分是因为未充分体察其变化演替所导致的对这一 理论的误解，部分是因为这一理论背后的法学思考与我国既有制度间的差异。但这些差异 却促使我们对由行政诉权所辐射的核心公法问题重新进行思考，并在此基础上通过对学理 和制度的重新整序来优化这一理论的本土适用。
关键词 保护规范理论 主观公权利 一般法依赖
Abstract: After being brought into China’s administrative trial, the theory of protection norms provides a new reference for the determination of interested parties in administrative litigation, but it also causes many doubts. In addition to the uncertainty of application caused by the miscellaneous rules of interpretation, the stringent application caused by the emphasis on the protection of personal interests, and the arbitrary legislation caused by the‘dependence of the general law’, the doubts about the theory of protection norms in our country include whether it matches the overall orientation of administrative litigation and whether it is suitable for the realistic development of the administrative litigation. These disputes are partly due to the misunderstanding of the theory caused by the insufficient understanding of its change and succession, partly because of the discrepancy between the legal thinking behind the theory and China’s existing systems. This urges us to rethink the core public law issues radiated by the right to administrative litigation, and optimize the local application of this theory on this basis through the reorganization of the theory and systems.