作者：程 雷
作者介绍：中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心副教授
出版日期：2016年6月9日
内容提要 2012 年刑事诉讼法修改过程中对指定居所监视居住进行了重新定位,新 刑事诉讼法近三年来的法律实践表明,这一制度实施状况差强人意。 实践中的问题不少: 执法标准不统一、适用不规范;不少法律规定不知如何执行;规避法律的情形具有普遍性; 法律滥用、异化问题突出并伴随着侵犯人权的重大风险。 上述问题的解决正道应当是回归 立法精神,运用法律解释技术,明晰指定居所监视居住的性质与定位,从其限制自由的强制 措施本质出发,纠偏司法适用的错误倾向,回应实务困惑。 对于指定居所监视居住适用对 象上的“无固定住处” 、“特别重大贿赂犯罪” 、后续能否转捕都应当进行规范解释;对于执 行指定居所监视居住的执行地点与执行主体也迫切需要明晰涵义以规范司法适用。
关键词 监视居住 指定居所监视居住 限制自由
Abstract: Surveillance at a designated place of residence was redefined in 2012 during the process of revising the Criminal Procedure Law. Legal practice in recent three years demonstrates that the system implementation is barely satisfactory. The problems in practice include a lack of criterion for law enforcement and standardization in application; no ideas on how to implement quite a few provisions in practice; widespread situation of the evasion of law; abuse of the law and a prominent issue of dissimilation with a major risk of infringing human rights. In order to solve aforesaid problems, we shall conform to legislative spirits and make good use of legal interpretation skills. Surveillance at a designated place of residence in nature should be a kind of limiting liberty in the light of its compulsory measures, which shall be regarded as the base for correcting judicial applications and resolve practical issues. We shall normatively interpret the concept of “ no permanent residence” , “ outrageous crime of bribery” and whether or not such measure can be changed to detention in the suitable object for surveillance at a designated place of residence. Moreover, it is in urgent need of clarifying implementation location and execution authorities of surveillance at a designated place of residence so as to regularize judicial applications.