作者：陆永棣
作者介绍：浙江省高级人民法院高级法官，审判委员会委员
出版日期：2016年4月9日
内容提要 立案登记制的确立，标志着选择性司法的终结。但转型期人民法院通过立 案审查对纠纷进行选择性司法又有其深刻的政治、社会和法律原因。以立案登记制取代立 案审查制，首先体现为法院在立案程序上已从职权模式转向诉权保障模式，更深层意义在 于法院的司法角色或说职能应该有一个很大的变化。但在通过立案审查制采取选择性司 法的三大因素仍然存在，在我国社会仍将处于较长时期的社会转型这一大背景下，平衡好 立案登记制有诉必理、有案必立与受理“依法应该受理的案件”之间的关系，必须处理好几 个方面问题: 第一，把握好立案过程中登记与审查的关系; 第二，确立司法有限的理念，明确 受案范围; 第三，倡导纠纷多元化解，尽快建立诉前强制调解程序; 第四，规制与防范不当行 使诉权特别是滥诉行为。
关键词 立案审查 选择性司法 立案登记
Abstract: Case-filing registration system marks the end of selective justice． However，for the People’s Court in transformation period，there are profound political，social and legal reasons for it to apply selective justice in dealing with conflicts through case-filing review system． The replacement of the case-filing review system by the case-filing registration system firstly is meaningful． Firstly，it represents that in case-filing procedure，the court has transferred from the authority doctrine to protection of right of action． More importantly，there should be a big change in the judicial role or power of the court． However， the above-mentioned three factors which lead to the application of selective justice through casefiling review system still exist． In the context that our society will be in a long term of transformation，in order to balance the acceptance of each lawsuit and filing of each case and the dealing of“cases should be dealt with in accordance with law”，the following issues must be managed． Firstly，balancing the relationship between registration and review in case filing procedure; secondly，establishing the notion of limited justice and specify the scope of case acceptance; thirdly， advocating resolving disputes in multiple ways and speed the establishment of compulsory mediation procedure before litigation; and lastly，regulating and preventing from improperly exercising right to action，particularly abuse of action．