作者：冯俊伟
作者介绍：山东大学法学院讲师，法学博士
出版日期：2015年8月9日
内容提要 在打击跨境犯罪及犯罪分子的跨国流动中，域外取得的刑事证据在本国刑 事审判中具有重要意义。域外取得的刑事证据之可采性判断遭遇的最大难题是各国刑事 司法主权的隔阂，具体立法层面牵涉法律依据重叠、证据规则多元、权利保障差异等多重因 素。从国际刑事司法协助的演进来看，对这一问题的解决存在程序优先于实体、实体优先 于程序、“程序—实体”二元分立、替代性解决方式四种立法思路。我国立法、司法中采取 的真实性审查方式忽略了对被追诉人的权利保障。为了促进对跨境犯罪的打击和跨境追 逃工作高效、有序的展开，我国相关立法应予完善。
关键词 域外刑事证据 证据可采性 证据排除 司法协助
Abstract: In fighting against transnational crimes and the cross-border flow of the criminals，the criminal evidence obtained abroad were great significance in the national criminal trial． The biggest problem in the course of judging admissibility of criminal evidence obtained abroad was that the barriers of sovereignty of national criminal justice． In specific legislative level，it involves the overlapping of legal basis，the pluralism of evidence rules and discrepancy in protection of rights in criminal procedure． From the evolution of international criminal judicial assistance，the solutions to this problem have four legislative ideas: solving the problem of admissibility of criminal evidence obtained abroad by determining the applicable law of obtaining evidence，formulating the standard of admissibility of criminal evidence obtained abroad，the admissibility and the obtaining of evidence depend on different legal norms and alternative solutions． In China’s legislations and judicial practice，courts mainly focus on the reliability of the criminal evidence obtained abroad，it ignore the protection of rights of the accused． In order to promote the fighting against transnational crimes and facilitating the work in pursuit of the cross-border criminals，China ＇s relevant legislations should be improved．