作者：李剑
作者介绍：上海交通大学凯原法学院教授
出版日期：2025年6月9日
内容提要：作为我国竞争法最早规定的限制竞争行为类型之一，附加不合 理交易条件缺少理论关注，含义也并不清晰。然而，实务中却出现了相当数量的案件。通过梳理与分析可以发现，这些案件不仅缺少对附加不合理交易条件的整体性理解，在具体要件的把握上也有明显欠缺，导致法条适用宽泛、行为类 型边界模糊。由于附加不合理交易条件的独特性，难以进行制度与实践的比较和借鉴，需要从现实与理论两个层面来予以回应。在现实层面，应将附加不合理交易条件限缩于捆绑，从而减少法条适用上的体系性冲突；在理论层面，现代反垄断法从当然违法原则向合理原则的转变，很大程度上消解了行为形式的 价值。应将竞争效果和行为形式相结合，才能够更好地确定附加不合理交易条 件的反垄断法意义。
关键词：反垄断法 附加不合理条件交易 构成要件 竞争效果
Abstract: As one of the earliest types of restrictive competition behaviors stipulated in China’s competition law, the addition of unreasonable trading conditions has received limited theoretical attention, and its meaning remains unclear. However, a considerable number of cases have emerged in practice. Through the sorting and analysis, it becomes evident that they not only lack a comprehensive understanding of the unreasonable trading conditions added, but also exhibit obvious deficiencies in grasping specific elements, leading to broad application of the law and blurred boundaries between behavior types. Due to the uniqueness of adding unreasonable trading conditions, comparative studies of system and practice are challenging. Solutions must be addressed from both practical and theoretical perspectives. On the practical level, unreasonable trading conditions should be limited to bundling to reduce systemic conflicts in the application of the law. On the theoretical level, the shift in modern anti-monopoly law from per se illegality to the rule of reason has largely diminished the significance of behavioral forms. The integration of competitive effects and behavioral forms is necessary to better determine the anti-monopoly implications of adding unreasonable trading conditions.