摘要(Abstract):
本文首次提出了测量重新犯罪风险的逐级年龄生平境遇犯罪理论。首先,在研究犯罪发展理论、逐级年龄非正式社会控制理论、综合犯罪理论之于犯罪人持续与终止犯罪解释力的基础上,提出逐级年龄生平境遇犯罪理论的三个核心命题及11项相应假设。其次,设定了年龄、早年家庭依恋强度、早年学校依恋强度、服刑境况、生平遭遇、不良交往行为强度、反社会行为强度、反社会人格强度的八个测量模型,在对来自不同类型监狱的1238个在押犯随机样本的问卷调查与回归分析的基础上,按照P值小于0.05的标准,从八个测量模型中逐一提取了20项预测因子,创建年龄、生平境遇、行为与选择三个测量模型。根据三个测量模型的二元logistic回归分析结果,论证了逐级年龄生平境遇犯罪理论的三个核心命题。
关键词(KeyWords): 年龄;生平境遇;重新犯罪风险
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 曾赟;
Email:
参考文献(References):
- [1]对于犯罪人持续犯罪的原因,我国犯罪学理论研究成果较为匮乏。我国有学者曾提出过犯罪场论、社会控制理论等,但他们缺乏对之检验与证明。国外犯罪学者在这一方面的研究成果甚为丰富,其中社会学习理论、社会结构理论、非正式社会控制理论、理性选择理论、犯罪发展理论等较具代表性。SeeAkers R,Social Learning and Social Structure:AGeneral Theory of Crime and Deviance,Boston:Northeastern University Press,1998;Blumstein A,Cohen J,Roth J,Visher C,eds,Criminal Careers and‘Career Criminals’,vol.1,Washington,D.C:National Academy Press,1986;Derek B.Cornish,Nonald V.Clarke,The Reasoning Criminal:Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending,New York:Spinger-Verlag,1986;Le Blanc M,Loeber R,Developmental Criminology Updated,in Tonry M(eds),Crime and Justice:AReviewof Research,Vol.23,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1998;Moffitt T,Adolescent-Limited and life-Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior:A Developmental Taxonomy,100Psychology Review4(1993),pp.674-701;SampsonR,Laub J,Crime in the Making:Pathways and Turning Points through Life,MA:Cambridge Harvard University Press,1993.
- [2]Michael Gottfredson,Travis Hirschi,Control Theory and the Life-Course Perspective,Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention4(1995),pp.131-142.
- [3]Robert J.Sampson and John H.Laub,Understanding Variability in Lives through Time:Contributions of Life-Course Criminology,Studieson Crime and Crime Prevention4(1995),pp.143-158.
- [4]Daniel Olweus,Stability of Aggressive Reaction Patterns in Males:A Review,Psychological Bulletin86(1979),pp.852-875.
- [5]Robert J.Sampson and John H.Laub,AGeneral Age-Graded Theory of Crime:Lessons Learned and the Future of Life-Course Criminology,Advances in Criminology Theory14,in David P.Farrington(eds.),NJ:Transaction Publishers,2005,pp.165-181.
- [6]Rolf Loeber and Marc Le Blanc,Toward a Developmental Criminology,in Michael Tonry(eds.),Crime and Justice:AReviewof Research,Vol.12,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1990,pp.375-473.
- [7]Ronald L.Akers,Social Learning and Social Structure:A General Theory of Crime and Deviance,Boston:Northeastern University Press,1998,p.127.
- [8]曾赟:《对自由意志与因果决定论的修正:犯罪原因兼容论的提出》,载《政治与法律》2009年第3期。