摘要(Abstract)：
GATT WTO争端解决机制中第三方参加诉讼制度 ,尤其是参加专家组诉讼程序 ,其司法实践总是走在法律理论的前面 ;而国际法院争端解决机制中第三方参加诉讼制度 ,其司法实践总是恪守法律对第三方参加诉讼的方式、享有的诉讼权利的明确规定。这两种争端解决机制中的第三方参加诉讼制度 ,前者有逐步向后者靠拢的趋势 ,特别是体现在专家组授予第三方特殊诉讼权利方面。本文认为 ,DSU应该对第三方参加诉讼的方式及其享有的诉讼权利做出明确规定 ,以更有效地发挥第三方参加诉讼制度的作用
关键词(KeyWords)： 第三方;第三方参加;第三方权利;专家组;国际法院
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 方向,王海英,密启娜
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- ①TheWTO’s“MostIndividualContribution”,byRenatoRuggiero,WTOPress,April17,1997
- ①②③④⑤⑥⑦DS32R ,at2,para10.DS38.DS32.
- C M 168(CouncilMeetingof26May1983)at5.
- C M 186(CouncilMeetingof12March1985)at6.
- C M 83(CouncilMeetingof19December1972)at4.
- 美国、加拿大、墨西哥、巴拿马、菲律宾、古巴、海地、哥伦比亚、哥斯达黎加、多米尼加共和国、玻利维亚、厄瓜多尔、萨尔瓦多、危地马拉、洪都拉斯共和国、利比里亚、尼加拉瓜、委内瑞拉。
- ①②③④WT DS27R ,atpara.7.8(b).WT DS277.MaryE .Footer:SomeAspectsofThirdPartyInterventioninGATT WTODisputeSettlementProceedings,InternationalTradeLawandtheGATT WTODisputeSettlementSystem,KluwerLawInternational1997,p.235.
- NickCovelli:PublicInternationalLawandThirdPartyParticipationinWTOPanelProceedings,JournalofWorldTrade,33(2),1999,p.132.
- ①②NickCovelli:PublicInternationalLawandThirdPartyParticipationinWTOPanelProceedings,JournalofWorldTrade33(2),1999,p.133.
- WT DS27R ,atpara.7.9.
- ①②③④⑤[美]E .博登海默:《法理学:法律哲学与法律方法》,邓正来译,中国政法大学出版社1999年版,第559页。
- JohnJackson:TheJurisprudenceofGATTandtheWTOInsightonTreatyLawandEconomicRelations,CambridgeUniversityPress,2000,p.120.
- 同上。
- WT DS22R .MaryE .
- Footer:SomeAspectsofThirdPartyInterventioninGATT WTODisputeSettlementProceedings,InternationalTradeLawandtheGATT WTODisputeSettlementSystem,KluwerLawInternational1997,p.233.
- NickCovelli:PublicInternationalLawandThirdPartyParticipationinWTOPanelProceedings,JournalofWorldTrade33(2),1999,p.139.
- ①②③BeforethePermanentCourtofInternationalJustice,forerunnerofthecurrentCourt,therewasasuccessfulattempttointerveneinS .S .Wimbledon(U .K .,France,ItalyandJapanv.Germany),1923
- P .C .I .J.(ser.A)No.1(Polandintervening).BeforetheICJ ,therehasbeenonesuccessfulinterventionunderArticle63inHayadelaTore(Colombiav.Peru),1951
- I .C .J.Rep.71(Cubaintervening).OtherrequeststointervenemadeunderArticle62weredenied,includingNuclearTests(Australiav.France),1973I.
- C .J.Rep.320(Fijirequestingintervention);CaseConcerningtheContinentalShelf(TunisiaLibyanArabJamahiriya),1981I .
- C .J .Rep.3(Maltarequestingintervention);CaseConcerningtheContinentalShelf(LibyanArabJamahiriyaMalta),1984I.
- C .J .Rep.3(Italyrequestingintervention)andLand,IslandandMaritimeFrontierDispute(HondurasElSalvador),1990I.
- C .J.Rep.92(Nicaraguarequestingintervention).Arequesttointervenewasmade,anddenied,underArticle63inMilitaryandParamilitaryActivitiesinandagainstNicaragua(Nicaraguav.U .S .),1984I .
- C .J .Rep.215(ElSalvadorrequestingintervention).The“DunkedDraft”fromtheGATTSecretariat,Dec.20,1991,TheUruguayRoundNegotiationsCommittee(1992)atS .9.
- AmongthechangesbetweentheDunkedDraftandtheUnderstandingwasthetitle(“thirdcontractingparties”versus“thirdparties”)andminorclarificationofthetext.Anearlierversionofthedraftcirculatedasa“decision”arisingfromtheMontrealGenevaMid-TermReviewof1988-89,conditioneddisclosureofwrittensubmissionstothirdpartiesontheparties’permission.ItalsodidnotmentionthirdpartyaccesstonormalGATTdisputesettlementprocedures,aswaslaterprovidedinArticle10(4).SeeGeneralAgreementonTariffsandTrade:DecisionsAdoptedattheMid-TermReviewoftheUruguayRound,28I.
- L .M .1025,1033(1989).“Substantialinterest”occursintheGATT 1994andassociatedagreementstwiceintheUnderstandingontheInterpretationofArticleXXVIIIoftheGeneralAgreementonTariffsandTrade1994,1WTOTreatiesBinder23,onceintheMarrakechProtocoltotheGeneralAgreementonTariffsandTrade1994art.4,1WTOTreatiesBinder25,onceintheAgreementonAgricultureart.12,1WTOTreatiesBinder27,twiceintheAgreementonSafeguardsart.5(2),1WTOTreatiesBinder327andfourtimesintheDSU .
- ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧⑨BernhardJansen:“WTODisputeSettlementProceduresandTheEuropeanUnion”,InternationalLawandTheHague’s750thAnniversary,byWyboP .Heere,T .M .CAsserPress,1999,p.307.
- 谢守分:《世贸组织争端解决机制中第三方当事人的权利———以荷尔蒙案为线索》,载《上海对外贸易学院学报》2000年第4期,第3,25-28页。
- JohnP .Gaffney,DueProcessInTheWorldTradeOrganization:TheNeedForProceduralJusticeInTheDisputeSettlementSystem,14Am.U .Int’lL .Rev.1173,1195(1999).
- ThomasM .Franck,FairnessinInternationalLawandInstitutions(1995),at340(di
