摘要(Abstract)：
排除合理怀疑是英美法系刑事证明标准的经典性表述 ,但其到底是如何产生的 ,一直是一个有争议的问题。对于应否对其进行定义 ,在理论和司法实践中也一直争论非常激烈。对其涵义的界定主要有七种方式。当前 ,排除合理怀疑在西方面临着严峻的挑战 ,原因主要来自三个方面 :一是自身涵义过于抽象和模糊 ;二是司法实践中对其界定相互矛盾 ;三是缺乏可操作性。
关键词(KeyWords)： 排除合理怀疑;涵义;抽象;可操作性
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 陈永生
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- Statev.Wilson,N .J.L .502,506(1793).
- ④同③,p.516-518.
- AnthonyA .Morano,AReexaminationoftheDevelopmentoftheReasonableDoubtRule,B .U .L .Rev.Vol.55,1975,p.507-508.
- Bond’sCase,27How.St.Tr.523(Ir.1798);Finney’sCase,26How.St.Tr.1019(Ir.1798).
- Woolmingtonv.DirectorofPublicProsecutions(1935)A .C .462.
- StanleyAschiff,EvidenceintheLitigationProcess(2ded),theCarwellCompanyLimited,1983,p.1123;
- 同②,p.1120-1124;Cross,CrossonEvidence(ThirdAustrilianEdition),Butterworths,1986,243-249;AndrewBruce&GerardMccoy,CriminalEvidenceinHongKong,Butterworths,1987,p.46-52.
- TheHarvardLawReviewAssociation,ReasonableDoubt:AnArgumentAgainstDefinition,Harv.L .Rev.Vol.108,1995,p.1955-1972.
- HenryA .Diamond,ReasonableDoubt:toDefine,ornottoDefine,Colum.L .Rev.Vol.90,1990,p.1719.
- JessicaN .Cohen,theReasonableDoubtJuryInstruction:GivingMeaningtoaCriticalConcept,Am.J .Crim.L .Vol.22,1995,p.682.
- UnitedStatesv.Lawson,507F .2d433(1974),cert.denied,420U .S .1004(1975).
- JessicaN .Cohen,theReasonableDoubtJuryInstruction:GivingMeaningtoaCriticalConcept,Am.J .Crim.L .Vol.22,1995,p.684.
- Dunv.Perrin,570F .2d21,23(1stCir1978),cert.denied,437U .S .910(1978).
- UnitedStatesv.Adkins,937F .2d947,950(4thCir.1991).
- UnitedStatesv.Reives,15F .3d42,45-46(4thCir.1994).
- enbanc又称sittingenbanc,指由法院的所有法官出庭审理和作出判决,通常简称满席听审。在美国,联邦最高法院和各州终审法院都以满席听审的方式开庭审理;在上诉法院,满席听审通常只适用于具有极大争议或涉及公共利益的案件,以及本院中一个或多个合议庭在主要法律观点上存有分歧的案件。参见[美]彼得·G·伦斯特洛姆:《美国法律词典》,贺卫方等译,中国政法大学出版社1998年版,第289页。
- Devitt&Blackmar,FederalJuryPracticeandInstructions(4thed.),WestPublishingCo.1987,p.354.
- 同②,p.686-687.
- 同②,p.687-688.
- WilliamBojczuk&D .J .Cracknell(revisedandupdated),EvidenceTextbook,HLTPublications,1995,p.82.
- Cagev.Louisiana,498U .S .39,40(1990).
- RupertCross&NancyWilkins,AnOutlineoftheLawofEvidence,Butterworths,1980,p.36.
- HenryADiamond,ReasonableDoubt:toDefine,ornottoDefine,Colum.L .Rev.Vol.90,1990,p.1717.
- JessicaN .Cohen,theReasonableDoubtJuryInstruction:GivingMeaningtoaCriticalConcept,Am.J .Crim.L .Vol.22,1995,p.694.
- 同①。
- M .I.Aronson,N .S .Reaburn,M .S .Weinberg,Litigation:EvidenceandProcedure(3rded.),Butterworths,1982,p.487.
- AdrianKeane,theModernLawofEvidence,Butterworths,1996.p.85.
- UnitedStatesv.Colonpagan,F .3d80,81(1stCir.1993).
- RichardMay,CriminalEvidence,Sweet&Maxwell,1986,p.58.
- AdrianKeane,theModernLawofEvidence,Betterworths,1996,p.87.
- R .v.Gray(1973),58Cr.App.Rep.177.
- RichardMay,CriminalEvidence,Sweet&Maxwell,1986,p.58;AdrianKeane,theModernLawofEvidence,Betterworths,1996,p.87.
- 同③,p.687.
- JessicaN .Cohen,theReasonableDoubtJuryInstruction:GivingMeaningtoaCriticalConcept,Am.J .Crim.L .Vol.22,1995,p.679-680.
- Hollandv.UnitedStates,348U .S .121(1954).
- JonO .Newman,Beyond“ReasonableDoubt”,N .Y .U .L .Rev.Vol.68,1993,p.982.
- ⑨同⑥.
- PeterGillies,LawofEvidenceinAustralia(2ded.),LegalBooks,1987,p.70.
- AnthonyA .Morano,AReexaminationoftheDevelopmentoftheReasonableDoubtRule,B .U .L .Rev.Vol.55,1975,p.513-514.
- 同②,p.681.
- 李学灯:《证据法比较研究》,台湾五南图书出版有限公司1992年版,第666-667页。
- PeterMurphy,CriminalPractice,BlackstonePressLimited,1997,p.1846.
- 同②,p.694.
- JessicaN .Cohen,theReasonableDoubtJuryInstruction:GivingMeaningtoaCriticalConcept,Am.J .Crim.L .Vol.22,1995,p.686.
- JonO .Newman,Beyond“ReasonableDoubt”,N .Y .U .L .Rev.Vol.68,1993.p.984.
- Devitt&Blackmar,FederalJuryPracticeandInstructions(4thed.),WestPublishingCo.1987,p.354.
- 同②,p.687.
- FederalJudicialCenter,PatternCriminalJuryInstruction,Instruction21,1987.
- PeterMurphy,MurphyonEvidence,BlackstonePressLimited,1997,p.110.
- [美]乔恩·R·华尔兹:《刑事证据大全》,何家弘译,中国人民大学出版社1993年版,第313页。
- UnitedStatesv.Fatico,458F .Supp.388,406(E .D .N .Y .1978),Affd.603,F .2d,1053(2dCir.1979),cert.Denied,444,U .S .1073(1980).
- JessicaN .Cohen,theReasonableDoubtJuryInstruction:GivingMeaningtoaCriticalConcept,Am.J .Crim.L .Vol.22,1995,p.682.
- TheHarvardLawReviewAssociation,ReasonableDoubt:AnArgumentAgainstDefinition,Harv.L .Rev.Vol.108,1995,p.1972.
