摘要(Abstract)：
I. INTRODUCTION The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that the construction of ecological civilization is a millennium plan for the sustainable development of the Chinese nation. Constructing ecological civilization and adhering to green development is the basic strategy of adhering to and developing socialism with Chinese characteristics in the
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 李婷;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1 Yang Kai, A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Specialization of Environmental Justice and the Construction of the Trial Mode of'Three Trials', 1 Law of the Rule of Law 245(2015).
- 2 BEIJING PROCURATORATE FIRST FILED A CIVIL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AGAINST AIR POLLUTION, at http://www.bj.xinhuanet.com/jzzg/2017-07/27/c_l 12139183l.htm(Last visited on November 27, 2018).
- 3 James D. Sullivan, Leslie Addison, Sharyn Jones and Bishop Robin Hood Greene, individually, and on behalf of a Class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, 226 F. Supp. 3d 288(D. Vt. 2016).
- 4 Hachamovitch v. DeBuono, 159 F.3d 687, 697(2d Cir. 1998).
- 5 Bethphage Lutheran Serv., Inc. v. Weicker, 965 F.2d, at 1239, 1243(2d Cir. 1992); Cranley v. Nat'1 Life Ins. Co. ofVt., 144 F.Supp.2d 291, 299(D. Vt. 2001).
- 6 Id., 965 F.2d, at 1243.
- 7 New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350(S. Ct.1989)('While Burford is concerned with protecting complex state administrative processes from undue federal interference, it does not require abstention whenever there exists such a process, or even in all cases where there is a'potential for conflict'with state regulatory law or policy').
- 8 Supra note 4,697.
- 9 Martin v. Shell Oil Co., 198 F.R.D. 580, 586(D. Conn. 2000)('No ruling as to whether the defendants trespassed on the plaintiffs'property will necessarily conflict wilh any finding of the state agency.')
- 10 CSX Transp., Inc. v. Easterwood, 507 U.S. 658, 668, 113 S.Ct. 1732, 123 L.Ed.2d 387(1993)(negligence liability could complement federal regulations); see also Martin, 198 F.R.D. at 587(state agency was charged with protecting the environmentfor the public's health and safety, but not with vindicating individual property rights such as those asserted by the plaintiffs in this case).
- 11 United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 353, 83 S.Ct. 1715, 10 L.Ed2d 915(1963)(primary jurisdiction'requires judicial abstention in cases where protection of the integrity of a regulatory scheme dictates preliminary resort to the agency which administers the scheme').
- 12 Johnson v. Nyack Hosp., 86 F.3d 8(2d Cir. 1996).
- 13 Natl Commc'nsAss'n, Inc. v. Am. Tel.&Tel. Co., 46 F.3d 220, 223(2d Cir. 1995).
- 14 SHEN DAMING, ON EQUITY, at 2(University of International Business and Economics Press, 1997).
- 15 Gong Gu&Chen Yao, Making up for the Shortage of Civil Liability in Environnmental Public Interest Litigation by Restraining Order System:Enlightenment and Reference from American Experience, 4 Journal of Henan University of Finance and Economics50(2017).
- 16 Article 65 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- 17 Tan Hong&Wang Peng,A Brief Review of the Criteria for Review of US Environmental Judicial Restraint Order Relief, People's Court,April 13, 2015, at 008 Edition.
- 18 JIANG HONGZHEN, ON THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY:JUDICIAL EVALUATION OF THE CHOICE OF GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION TOOLS, at 1(Law Press, 2010).
- 19 Lv Zhongmei, The Environmental Justice Reason Cannot Stop at Sky-High Compensation:A Review of Taizhou's Environmental Public Interest Litigation Case, 3 China Law 244(2016).
