摘要(Abstract)：
水资源国家所有权在公私属性上的不确定性,导致现实中出现了国家对水资源支配的所有者身份和对其开发利用上管理者职能的混同,选择单纯的公权或私权调整模式都不足以解决越来越复杂的水资源所有权问题。因此为确保水资源的经济、社会和生态环境效益的共同实现,有必要对水资源国家所有权的法律性质予以明确。本文从公权与私权的协同性视角出发,探讨了公权与私权并非截然对立,水资源的多重属性决定了国家所有权在主体、客体、权利利益,以及法律依据上需要公权和私权的相互协同、交叉和互补。
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation): the research achievement of National Social Science Fund Project “Research on Right and Power of Water Resource under the Cooperation between Public Law and Private Law”(1 1CFX022);;
Sichuan Social Science Fund Project “Research on Water Resource from the Perspective of Public and Private Law”(SC10C010);;
Sichuan Educational Department Project “Innovation Team on Environmental and Resource Law”
作者(Author): 汪蕾;赤沙莫日;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1 LANG HUIXING,PROPERTY LAW DRAFT PROPOSAL OF CHINA,at 212(Social Sciences Academic Press,2000).
- 2 WANG LIMING,PROPERTY LAW THEORY,at 2273(China University of Political Science and Law Press,2003).
- 3 XIAO QIANGANG,NATURAL RESOURCES LAW,at 67(Law Press,1992).
- 4 Zhao Hongmei&Wang Chunlei,Analysis on the Lack of Ownership of Natural Resources in China Property Law,The Proceedings of the National Conference of Environmental and Resources Law(2003).
- 5 Gao Fupin,Establishing Legal System for the Classification of State-owned Assets,5 Journal of East China University of Politics and Law,36(2000).
- 6 Shui Bing,Two-Step-Structure Theory of State Ownership over Natural Resources,4 Chinese Journal of Law,3-18(2013).
- 7 ROUSSEAU,THE SOCIAL CONTRACT,at 25-26(The Commercial Press,1997).
- 8 THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA,MARX,LENIN AND STALIN BOOK COMPILATION BUREAU,MARX ANG ENGELS ANTHOLOGY(VOLUME 4),at 249(People's Publishing House,2011).
- 9 PIETRO BONFANTE,TEXTBOOK OF ROMAN LAW,at 51(Huang Feng trans.,China University of Political Science and LawPress,1992).
- 10 Wang Xu,Analysis on the Function of Constitution Law over State Ownership of Natural Resources,6 China Legal Sciencei 5-19(2013).
- 11 ROBERT ORESKO,G.C.GIBBS&H.M.SCOTT,ROYAL AND REPUBLICAN SOVEREIGHTY IN EARLLY MODERN EUROPE:ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF RAGNHILD HATTON,at 3(Cambridge University Press,1997).
- 12 DAVID-MILLER,BLACKWELL ENCYCLOPADIA OF POLITICS(REVISED),at 778(Deng Zhenglai trans.,China University of Political Science and Law Press.2002).
- 13 Wang Yong,Three-Layer-Structure Theory of State Ownership of Natural Resources,4 Chinese Journal of Law,48-61(2013).
- 14 Enter into force in 2002.
- 15 Entered into force in 2007.
- 16 WANGYAHUA,ECONOMIC EXPLANATION OF CHINAS WATER RIGHTS,at 161-164(People's Publishing House,2005).
- 17 ANDREA.DI.PORO&LIE YANLING,PROTECTION OF COMMON PROPERTY UNDER ROMAN LAW AND ITALIAN CIVIL CODE,at 225(Ding Mei trans.,China University of Political Science and Law Press,1995).
- 18 Jiang Guangjun,Differentiating Offensache Sache and Domaine Public,4 Seeker(2008).
- 19 FRENCH CIVIL CODE(VOLUME 1),at 451(Luo Jiezhen trans.,Law Press,2005).
- 20 FRANCOISE.TERA&PHILIP.SENLE,FRENCH PROPERTY LAW(VOLUME2),at 665(Luo Jiezhen trans.,China Legal Publishing House,2008).
- 21 SHAN PINGJI,THE REACTION OF PRIVATE LAW AGAINST WATER CRISIS:ACQUISITION AND TRANSACTION OF WATER RIGHTS,at 39(Law Press,2012).
- 22 WANG MINGYANG,FRENCH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,at 240(China University of Political Science and Law Press,2007).
- 23 HANS.J.WOLF,OTTO.BACHOF&ROLF-STOBER,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW(VOLUME 2),at 474(The Commercial Press,2002).
- 24 DAQAO YANGYI,STRUCTURAL REVOLUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,at 204(Lv Yanbin trans.,China Renmin University Press,2008).
- 25 Otto Mayer,Verwaltungsrecht,Bd II.49 ff.
- 26 On the public property or privately-owned public trust property,the remainder is referred to as jus privatum under the premise that there is no harm to public trust use or public purpose,besides the jus publicum and the government's management power.Richard J.Lazarus,Changing Conceptions of Property and Sovereignty in Natural Resources:Questioning the Public Trust Doctrine,Iowa L.Rev.71,636(1996).
- 27 Wang Hongliang,Analysis of Water Rights Structure:from the Perspective of Public Property,4 Tsinghua Law Journal,110-111(2009).
- 28 Breuer,Offentliches und privates Wasserrecht,3.Aufl.2004,S.208 f.
- 29 Id.,S.74 f.
- 30 Wang Hongliang,supra note 27.
- 31 XIAO ZESHENG,PROPERTY LAW RESEARCH,at 129(Law Press,2009).
- 32 Ma Junju,The Basic Theory of State Ownership and Analysis of its Legal Framework,4 China Legal Science,97(2011).
- 33 Liu Chang,A Research on the Ownership,Public Property Management and Use of National Park in Germany,5 Legal System and Society,59(2012).
- 34 WANG JING,THE CONCEPT AND VALUE PURSUIT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PURSUIT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW-THE THEORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION PURPOSE,at 238-240(Law Press,2000).
- 35 Id.
- 36 Illinois Central Railroad Company v.Illinois,146 U.S.387(1892).
- 37 Id.
- 38 WANG JING,THE CONCEPT AND VALUE PURSUIT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PURSUIT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW:THE THEORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION PURPOSE,at 240-241(Law Press,2000).
- 39 Zachary C.Kleinsasser,Public and Private Property Rights:Regulatory and Physical Takings and the Public Trust Doctrine,B.C.Envtl.Aff.L.Rev.32,421-427(2005).
- 40 XIAO ZESHENG,supra note 31,94-95.
- 41 QIU QIU,RESEARCH ON THE OWNERSHIP SYSTEM OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN CHINA,at 170(Science Press,2010).
- 42 Erin Ryan,Public Trust and Distrust:the Theoretical Implications of the Public Trust Doctrine for Natural Resources Management,Envtl.L.31,495(2001).
- 43 XIAO ZESHENG,supra note 31,97.
- 44 WU ZHEN,RESEARCH ON THE PRINCIPE OF PUBLIC TRUST,at 10(Jilin University Doctoral Dissertation,2006).
- 45 J.AUSTIN,THE PRIVINCE OF JURISPRUDENCE DETERMINED,at 140(Weidenfeld&Nicholson,1954).
- 46 Lin Chunqing,Analysis of Legal Nature of State Ownership over Water Resources,The Research on Legal Issues of Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources and Protection of Water Ecological Environment:The Proceedings of the National Conference of Environmental and Resources Law(2008).
- 47 ZHOUNAN,ROMAN LAW(VOLUME 1),at 299(The Commercial Press,1994).
- 48 Shui Bing,supra note 6.
- 49 Michael Peel,Oil Curse Stalks Africa's Newest PetroState,Fin Time,10(2005).
- 50 XU DIYU,DIFFERENTIATING OWNERSHIP FROM CONSTITUTION LAW AND PRIVATE LAW:CRITICISM AGAINST OWNERSHIP UNDER THE DRAFT OF PROPERTY LAW,at http://www.civillaw.com.cn/article/default.asp?id=31926(Last visited on October 25,2015).
- 51 LIANG HUIXING,THE ISSUE OF CHINA CIVIL LAW AND ECONOMIC LAW,at 326(China Legal Publishing House,1999).
- 52 OLIVIERO DILIBERTO,ANALYSIS ON SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF OWNERSHIP:THE EVOLUTION HISTORY FROM ROMAN LAW TO MODERN CIVIL CODE,THE PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROMAN LAW,at 376(Zhai Yuanjian trans.,China Law and Codification of Civil Law,2009).
- 53 MARX,THE POVERTY OF PHILOSOPHY,KARL MAX AND FREDERICK ENGELS(VOLUME 4),at 180(People's Publishing House,1958).
- 54 Cheng Mingxiu,The Virtuality and Reality of Two-Step Theory,Soochow University Legal Journal,14(2).
- 55 Shui Bing,supra note 6.
- 56 Cheng Mingxiu,supra note 54.
- 57 Shui Bing,supra note 6.
- 58 Ma Junju,supra note 21,91.
