摘要(Abstract)：
In China,public interest litigation in administration is not a legal term.There are many opinions in legal scholarship about why we cannot build real public interest litigation in administration within the administrative procedure law.Our"national law"has no system of public interest litigation in administration,"Qing and Li"require judicature to respond to public interest litigation.How can this contradiction be settled?In this article,through empirical analysis of the trial process,
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): Yang Kai;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1 YE BIFENG,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,at 59(Wuhan University Press,1996).
- 2MA HUAIDE,THE IMPLEMENTATION AND GUARANTEE OF LAW,at 10(Beijing University Press,2007).
- 3ZHOU YOUYONG,STUDY ON THE BASIC PRINCIPLE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,at 17(Wuhan University Press,2005).
- 4Zhou Yongkang,Strengthen Social Construction,Innovate Social Management,Preserve the Social Stability in the Important Period of Strategic chance,7 Chang-an 4,4-5(2010).
- 5YANG HAIKUN AND ZANG ZHIYUAN,REVIEWS ON THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL LAW,at 631(Chinese Democratic Legal Press,2006).
- 6 YING SONGNIAN,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA,at 1757(Beijing:China Integrity Press,2005).
- 7JIANG BIXIN,STUDY ON THE TEN RELATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS,in ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIAL,at 33(Administrative Tribunals of the Supreme People’s Court ed.,The Law Press,2007).
- 8Social public interest is the extension of citizen’s fundamental rights entitled by the constitution.That which degree a nation pays attention to the citizen’s fundamental rights and social public interest and offers the judicial remedy is the ruler to prove the nation’s level of rule of law and the protection of human rights.People’s courts are important links to maintain social justice and rights entitled by constitution and laws are tangible when they have remedy methods,that is to say rights must be sued,which is the jurisprudential basis for the administrative judges to distinguish private interests from public interests in the administrative cases.
- 9 YAN YUNQIU,STUDY ON THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN PUBLIC INTEREST,at 58(The Law Press,2008).
- XI XIAOMING,THE PERCEPTION AND APPLICATION OF CHINA’S TORT,at 460(The People’s Court Press,2010).
- BENJAMIN N.CARDOZO,THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS,at 63(Su Li trans.,The Commercial Press,1998).
- Wan Exiang,Report in the Seminar of the Judicial Protection of Water Resource in the Supreme People’s Court.
- PIAO XIAOHONG,STUDY ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION SYSTEM IN ADMINISTRATION,in COUNTERMEASURES AND MECHANISMS OF JUDICIAL DISPUTES,at 765(The People’s Court Press,2007).
- The Supreme People’s Court,Annual Report of the People’s Court,People’s Court Daily,July 14,2010,at 5-8.
- The Opinions Concerning the Prevention and Dissolution of the Administrative Disputes and the Improvement the Resolution Mechanism of the Administrative Disputes from the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council,Document of the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party,Number 27(2006).
- XIONG YUEWEI,PUBLIC RELATION,at 209(Anhui People’s Press,1997).
