摘要(Abstract)：
I. INTRODUCTION The Provisions on Case Guidance ( hereinafter referred to as Provisions) were enacted by the Supreme People's Court on November 26,2010. The enactment of the Provisions marked a new stage of normative development in theGuiding Case system with Chinese characteristics. According to the Provisions,the Supreme People's Court issued the first batch of guiding cases on December20,2011,and the second batch of guiding cases,including 2 administrativecases and 2 civil cases respectively,on April 13,2012. The guiding case,No.8,Lin Fangqing v . Changshu Kailai Industry Co. ,Ltd . and DAI Xiaoming ,was recommended by the High People's Court of Zhejiang province. Afterdiscussion,the Supreme People's Court believed this case correctly applied thelaw under the comparative principle stipulated by the law,and would havepositive significance in guiding similar cases,protecting shareholders' legalrights,and regulating the corporate governance structure. ②1This case study thusanalyses and discusses guiding case No. 8,Lin Fangqing v . Changshu KailaiIndustry Co. ,Ltd. and DAI Xiaoming ,which involved a Corporate DissolutionDispute.
关键词(KeyWords)：
Abstract:
Keywords:
基金项目(Foundation): research project of Shanghai Young Teachers Cultivated Scheme, entitled " The Application of Tort Liability Law in the Field of Securities( ZZHD2F12006) ";;
a research project of East China University of PoliticalScience and Law,entitled"The Impact of Implementing Tort Liability Law on Financing Institution( 11H2K033) "
作者(Author): 姜影;Wang Hao;
Email:
参考文献(References)：
- 1The Guiding Work Office of the Supreme People's Court,The Understanding and Application of theGuiding Case No.8“Lin Fangqing v.Changshu Kailai Industry Co.,Ltd.and DAI Xiaoming”,15The People's Judicature 59,59 ( 2012).
- 2The Su Zhong Min Er Chu Zi No.0277 Civil Judgment 2006,( 2006苏中民二初字第0277号民事判决).
- 3The Su Shang Zhong Zi No.0043 Civil Judgment 2010,( 2010苏商终字第0043号民事判决).
- 4YUN CHANGCHUN,COMMENTARY ON GUIDING CASE NO.8 AND CORPORATE DEADLOCKISSUES,StanfordLawSchool,at http: / / cgc.law.stanford.edu / wp-content / uploads /2012 /11 / CGCP-Chinese-Commentary-6-Partner-Yuan.pdf,( Last visited April 22,2013).
- ①5Zhang Yan and Ma Qiang,A Research on the Relevant Issues of Judicial Dissolution-A Discussion onthe Basis of Article 183 of the Company Law,9 Legal Application 58,58 ( 2008).
- 6Wang Binzhou,On Judgment Standard of Judicial Dissolution-An Investigation from the Perspective of“Interpersonal Relation”and“Financial Condition”,511 Commercial Modernization 320,323 ( 2007).
- ③7For example,the case facts of Shanghai Boxing Gene Chip Co.,Ltd.v.Shanghai Bohua Gene ChipCo.,Ltd.tried by the Second Intermediate People's Court of Shanghai were similar to the case ofChenv.Zhejiang Xishan Pump Industry Co.,Ltd.,but the judgments were different.
- ④8The Judicial Dissolution is not Necessary,People's Court Daily,March 23,2007,at 4.
- 9Shi Liufang,The Company can be Deemed as Meeting Serious Difficulties Even Though the Companystill Makes Profits-Lin Fangqing v.Changshu Kailai Industry Co.,Ltd.and DAI Xiaoming,People'sCourt Daily,June 2,2011,at 2.
- 10Xu Cuixia and ZhangXiaokai,The Legal Application of Judicial Dissolution,22 People's Judicature100,102 ( 2009).
- 11NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW,ARTICLE 1111 ( B ) ( 3 ),at http: / /law.onecle.com / new-york / business-corporation / BSC01111_1111.html,( Last visited July 3,2013).
- ①12Liang Shangshang,Legal Difficulties and Path Selection of Company Deadlock Case,2 ZhejiangSocial Science 67,72 ( 2006).
- 13Song Xiao,On the Nature of the Abstract of Judgment,2 Legal Science 87,91 ( 2010).
- 14Zhang Qi,On the Guidance of the Guiding Cases,6 Law and Social Development 40,46 ( 2007).
- 15Research Office of the Supreme People's Court,Flexibly Using the Guiding Cases and AchievingOpen Justice,People's Court Daily,December 21,2011,at 003.
- 16KARL LARENZ,METHODOLOGY OF JURISPRUDENCE,at 258-259 ( Chen Ai'e trans.,CommercialPress,2004).
- ②17Zhang Xuewen,Market's Reason and Courts' Self-regulation-A Empirical Research on Company'sJudicial Dissolution,1 Law Review 29,29 ( 2012).
